Ledikwe Jenny H, Blanck Heidi M, Khan Laura Kettel, Serdula Mary K, Seymour Jennifer D, Tohill Beth C, Rolls Barbara J
Department of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16802, USA.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Aug;106(8):1172-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.05.013.
This study investigated food choices made by individuals consuming diets differing in energy density and explores relationships between energy density and diet quality.
Cross-sectional, nationally representative survey.
7,500 adults (older than 19 years) in the 1994-1996 Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals.
Energy density values were calculated from reported food intake. Subjects were classified as consuming a low-energy-density diet, medium-energy-density diet, or high-energy-density diet using tertile cutoffs. For each group, the percentage consuming various foods/beverages and the mean amount of foods/beverages they consumed was determined along with mean nutrient intakes.
Compared with participants consuming a high-energy-density diet, those with a low-energy-density diet had a lower energy intake but consumed more food, by weight, from most food groups. A low-energy-density diet included a relatively high proportion of foods high in micronutrients and water and low in fat, such as fruits and vegetables. Subjects with a low-energy-density diet consumed fewer (nonwater) beverages such as caloric carbonated beverages. They also consumed less fat and had higher intakes of several important micronutrients, including vitamins A, C, and B-6, folate, iron, calcium, and potassium.
These analyses further demonstrate the beneficial effects of a low-energy-density diet, which was associated with lower energy intakes, higher food intakes, and higher diet quality than a high-energy-density diet. To achieve a low-energy-density diet, individuals should be encouraged to eat a variety of fruits and vegetables as well as low-fat/reduced-fat, nutrient-dense, and/or water-rich grains, dairy products, and meats/meat alternatives.
本研究调查了食用能量密度不同饮食的个体所做的食物选择,并探讨了能量密度与饮食质量之间的关系。
横断面的全国代表性调查。
1994 - 1996年个人食物摄入量持续调查中的7500名成年人(19岁以上)。
根据报告的食物摄入量计算能量密度值。使用三分位数界限将受试者分为食用低能量密度饮食、中等能量密度饮食或高能量密度饮食的人群。对于每组,确定食用各种食物/饮料的百分比以及他们食用的食物/饮料的平均量,同时确定平均营养素摄入量。
与食用高能量密度饮食的参与者相比,食用低能量密度饮食的参与者能量摄入量较低,但按重量计算,从大多数食物组中摄入的食物更多。低能量密度饮食包括相对较高比例的富含微量营养素和水分且脂肪含量低的食物,如水果和蔬菜。食用低能量密度饮食的受试者饮用较少的(非水)饮料,如含热量的碳酸饮料。他们摄入的脂肪也较少,并且几种重要微量营养素的摄入量较高,包括维生素A、C和B - 6、叶酸、铁、钙和钾。
这些分析进一步证明了低能量密度饮食的有益效果,与高能量密度饮食相比,低能量密度饮食与较低的能量摄入量、较高的食物摄入量和较高的饮食质量相关。为了实现低能量密度饮食,应鼓励个体食用各种水果和蔬菜以及低脂/减脂、营养密集和/或富含水分的谷物、乳制品和肉类/肉类替代品。