Suppr超能文献

国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)核心集在急性后期早期康复设施中的验证:与其他三种功能测量方法的比较

Validation of International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) Core Sets for early postacute rehabilitation facilities: comparisons with three other functional measures.

作者信息

Grill Eva, Stucki Gerold, Scheuringer Monika, Melvin John

机构信息

ICF Research Branch, WHO FIC Collaborating Center (DIMDI), Institute for Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Aug;85(8):640-9. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000228537.17239.7f.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Short lists of International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) categories, ICF Core Sets, have been developed as reference standards for clinical practice and research. The objective of this study was to validate the ICF Core Sets for early postacute rehabilitation facilities against the measures most commonly used in early postacute rehabilitation, the FIM instrument, the Functional Assessment Measure, and the Barthel index.

DESIGN

Linking study matching the concepts of three commonly used outcome measures to corresponding ICF categories.

RESULTS

Corresponding ICF categories could be found for all of the items of the FIM instrument + Functional Assessment Measure and Barthel index. The 40 items of these three measures were linked to 33 different ICF categories. Four items could be linked to ICF categories that were not part of any of the Postacute ICF Core Sets.

CONCLUSIONS

The Postacute ICF Core Sets cover the concepts of the most frequently used measures in early postacute rehabilitation. Yet, many aspects of human functioning are not measured by the FIM instrument + Functional Assessment Measure and the Barthel index. If this information is considered relevant, these items would have to be added by using supplementary measures. Our comparison demonstrates the benefit of using a common language when comparing items using different wordings and concepts.

摘要

目的

国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)类别的简短清单,即ICF核心集,已被制定为临床实践和研究的参考标准。本研究的目的是对照急性后期早期康复中最常用的测量工具——FIM量表、功能评估量表和巴氏指数,验证急性后期早期康复机构的ICF核心集。

设计

将三种常用结局测量工具的概念与相应的ICF类别进行匹配的关联研究。

结果

FIM量表+功能评估量表和巴氏指数的所有项目都能找到相应的ICF类别。这三种测量工具的40个项目与33个不同的ICF类别相关联。有4个项目可与不属于任何急性后期ICF核心集的ICF类别相关联。

结论

急性后期ICF核心集涵盖了急性后期早期康复中最常用测量工具的概念。然而,FIM量表+功能评估量表和巴氏指数并未测量人类功能的许多方面。如果认为这些信息相关,则必须通过使用补充测量工具来添加这些项目。我们的比较表明,在比较使用不同措辞和概念的项目时,使用通用语言的好处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验