Nelson Geoffrey, Sylvestre John, Aubry Tim, George Lindsey, Trainor John
Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada N2L 3C5.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2007 Mar;34(2):89-100. doi: 10.1007/s10488-006-0083-x.
This research examined two premises of supported housing: (a) that consumer choice/control over housing and support and the quality of housing are important contributors to the subjective quality of life and adaptation to community living of people with mental illness, and (b) that apartments provide mental health consumers with more choice/control over housing and support than group living arrangements. To test these two hypotheses, we collected data from participants with mental illness housed through a government initiative in Ontario, Canada. A total of 130 participants completed a baseline interview, and 91 of those participants also completed a follow-up interview 9-months later. Support was found for both hypotheses. The results were discussed in terms of the paradigm of supported housing, previous research, and implications for housing policy and program development in the community mental health sector.
(a)消费者对住房、支持服务的选择/控制权以及住房质量是影响精神疾病患者主观生活质量和适应社区生活的重要因素;(b)与集体生活安排相比,公寓能为精神健康消费者提供更多关于住房和支持服务的选择/控制权。为了验证这两个假设,我们从加拿大安大略省一项政府倡议项目中安置的精神疾病参与者那里收集了数据。共有130名参与者完成了基线访谈,其中91名参与者在9个月后还完成了随访访谈。两个假设均得到了支持。我们从支持性住房的范式、先前的研究以及对社区精神卫生部门住房政策和项目发展的影响等方面对研究结果进行了讨论。