Suppr超能文献

曾经无家可归者的住房过渡差异以及健康和自主的变化。

Differences in housing transitions and changes in health and self-determination between formerly homeless individuals.

机构信息

Impuls-Netherlands Center for Social Care Research, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Amsterdam Research Institute for Societal Innovation, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2020 Oct 1;30(5):900-905. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa054.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To reduce homelessness, it is important to gain a better understanding of the differences between homeless people who remain in institutions and those who gain and can sustain independent housing. This longitudinal study explores differences in housing transitions and differences in changes in health and self-determination between formerly homeless people still living in institutions 2.5 years later and those now living in independent housing in the Netherlands.

METHODS

This study mapped the housing transitions of 263 participants from when they entered the social relief system (SRS) to 2.5 years later when they were in independent housing or institutions. These individuals were compared at the 2.5-year mark in terms of gender, age and retrospectively in terms of duration of homelessness. They were also compared with regard to changes in psychological distress, perceived health, substance use and self-determination.

RESULTS

Two and a half years after entering the SRS, 81% of participants were independently housed and 19% still lived in institutions. People in institutions had a longer lifetime duration of homelessness, were more often men, and their number of days of alcohol use had decreased significantly more, whereas independently housed people had shown a significant increase in their sense of autonomy and relatedness.

CONCLUSION

Formerly homeless people living in independent housing and in institutions show few health-related differences 2.5 years after entering the SRS, but changes in autonomy and relatedness are distinctly more prevalent, after the same period of time, in those who are independently housed.

摘要

背景

为了减少无家可归现象,深入了解仍居住在收容所的无家可归者与那些获得并能够维持独立住房的无家可归者之间的差异非常重要。本纵向研究旨在探讨荷兰 2.5 年后仍居住在收容所和独立住房中的前无家可归者之间的住房过渡差异,以及他们在健康和自决方面的变化差异。

方法

本研究绘制了 263 名参与者从进入社会救济系统 (SRS) 到 2.5 年后获得独立住房的住房过渡情况。在 2.5 年的时间点上,这些人在性别、年龄方面进行了比较,并从无家可归时间的角度进行了回顾性比较。他们还在心理困扰、感知健康、物质使用和自决方面的变化进行了比较。

结果

进入 SRS 2.5 年后,81%的参与者独立居住,19%的人仍居住在收容所。居住在收容所的人无家可归的时间更长,男性居多,他们的饮酒天数显著减少,而独立居住的人自主性和关联性明显增加。

结论

进入 SRS 2.5 年后,居住在独立住房和收容所的前无家可归者在健康方面的差异很小,但在同一时期,独立居住的人在自主性和关联性方面的变化更为明显。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

9
Effectiveness of case management for homeless persons: a systematic review.案例管理对 homeless persons 的有效性:系统综述。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Oct;103(10):e13-26. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301491. Epub 2013 Aug 15.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验