Piepsz A, Tondeur M, Ham H
CHU St Pierre, Department of Radioisotopes, Brussels, Belgium.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006 Dec;33(12):1477-82. doi: 10.1007/s00259-006-0179-2. Epub 2006 Jul 25.
Normal (51)Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) clearance values as a function of age were published a number of years ago. These values were based on data from children with a normal left to right ratio and a normal appearance on DMSA scintigraphy, despite the presence of an acute renal infection. At that time, the authors were unaware that hyperfiltration is a common phenomenon in patients with acute renal infection and that their normal values could have been significantly overestimated. The present work therefore aimed to re-appraise these normal values.
In a first step, in order to verify the previous results, the same type of population was selected, namely patients with present or past urinary tract infection but normal images and a normal left to right ratio on DMSA scintigraphy. In a second step, the selection was based on patients who had had no recent urinary tract infection. In both series, a single blood sample method was used for the evaluation of (51)Cr-EDTA clearance.
In the first group of patients, the results obtained were almost identical to those previously published. In the second group of patients, the results were significantly lower: after 2 years of age, the mean GFR value was 104 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (10th and 90th percentiles 81 and 135 ml/min/1.73 m(2), respectively), compared with 117 ml/min/1.73 m(2) in the first group.
The data of the second group are probably more representative of the true normal GFR values and can be applied to the entire paediatric population.
数年前公布了正常的(51)铬 - 乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)清除率值与年龄的函数关系。这些值基于患有急性肾感染但左向右分流率正常且二巯基丁二酸(DMSA)闪烁扫描图像正常的儿童的数据。当时,作者并未意识到高滤过是急性肾感染患者的常见现象,并且他们的正常值可能被显著高估。因此,本研究旨在重新评估这些正常值。
第一步,为了验证先前的结果,选择了相同类型的人群,即目前或过去患有尿路感染但图像正常且DMSA闪烁扫描左向右分流率正常的患者。第二步,选择基于近期无尿路感染的患者。在这两个系列中,均采用单血样法评估(51)铬 - EDTA清除率。
在第一组患者中,获得的结果与先前发表的结果几乎相同。在第二组患者中,结果显著更低:2岁以后,平均肾小球滤过率(GFR)值为104 ml/min/1.73 m²(第10和第90百分位数分别为81和135 ml/min/1.73 m²),而第一组为117 ml/min/1.73 m²。
第二组的数据可能更能代表真正的正常GFR值,并且可应用于整个儿科人群。