Sauders Brian D, Schukken Ynte, Kornstein Laura, Reddy Vasudha, Bannerman Tammy, Salehi Ellen, Dumas Nellie, Anderson Bridget J, Massey Jeffrey P, Wiedmann Martin
Department of Food ScienceCornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
J Food Prot. 2006 Jul;69(7):1680-9. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-69.7.1680.
To better understand the transmission and epidemiology of human listeriosis, 647 Listeria monocytogenes isolates obtained from human listeriosis cases in four U.S. locations (Michigan, Ohio, New York State, and New York City) over 61 months (1998 to 2003) were characterized by automated EcoRI ribotyping. A total of 65 ribotypes were differentiated among the characterized isolates; 393, 227, and 24 isolates were classified into lineages I, II, and III, respectively, and 3 isolates were not classified to lineage. The three most common ribotypes (responsible for 39% of all cases) represented L. monocytogenes epidemic clones, each of which had previously been linked to at least two human listeriosis outbreaks. Categorical analyses revealed that ribotypes and lineages were nonrandomly distributed among the four locations. Temporal cluster analysis of cases identified 13 statistically significant temporal subtype clusters, which represented 26% of all cases. Three of these clusters matched previously described human listeriosis outbreaks. Isolates involved in clusters belonged to nine ribotypes. Four, eight, and one cluster were caused by lineages I, II, and III, respectively. The two largest clusters were both caused by the epidemic clone representing ribotype DUP-1044A. Categorical analyses revealed no significant associations between lineage or ribotype and clinical manifestation (central nervous system infection, septicemia, fetal infection, or other infection) or disease outcome (fatal or not fatal). Although human listeriosis cases are caused by isolates belonging to a diversity of EcoRI ribotypes, specific lineage I epidemic clones cause a large number of human listeriosis cases. Many human listeriosis cases can be grouped into statistically significant temporal clusters, including widely distributed and region-specific clusters associated with isolates of various ribotypes. L. monocytogenes lineages and EcoRI ribotypes do not appear to differ in their likelihood of causing different clinical manifestations or mortality.
为了更好地了解人类李斯特菌病的传播和流行病学情况,对在61个月(1998年至2003年)期间从美国四个地点(密歇根州、俄亥俄州、纽约州和纽约市)的人类李斯特菌病病例中分离出的647株单核细胞增生李斯特菌进行了自动化EcoRI核糖分型鉴定。在所鉴定的分离株中总共区分出65种核糖型;分别有393株、227株和24株被归类为I、II和III系,还有3株未归类到系别。三种最常见的核糖型(占所有病例的39%)代表单核细胞增生李斯特菌流行克隆,每种克隆此前都至少与两起人类李斯特菌病暴发有关。分类分析显示,核糖型和系别在这四个地点之间的分布并非随机。对病例进行的时间聚类分析确定了13个具有统计学意义的时间亚型聚类,占所有病例的26%。其中三个聚类与先前描述的人类李斯特菌病暴发相匹配。聚类中涉及的分离株属于9种核糖型。分别有4个、8个和1个聚类是由I、II和III系引起。两个最大的聚类均由代表核糖型DUP-1044A的流行克隆引起。分类分析显示,系别或核糖型与临床表现(中枢神经系统感染、败血症、胎儿感染或其他感染)或疾病结局(致命或非致命)之间无显著关联。尽管人类李斯特菌病病例由属于多种EcoRI核糖型的分离株引起,但特定的I系流行克隆导致了大量人类李斯特菌病病例。许多人类李斯特菌病病例可被归为具有统计学意义的时间聚类,包括与各种核糖型分离株相关的广泛分布的聚类和特定区域的聚类。单核细胞增生李斯特菌的系别和EcoRI核糖型在引起不同临床表现或死亡率的可能性方面似乎没有差异。