Musick David W
Medical Education, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina 27834, USA.
Acad Med. 2006 Aug;81(8):759-65. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200608000-00015.
The author provides (1) a brief overview of the literature concerning program evaluation as applied to medical education, (2) a task-oriented conceptual model for use by residency directors in planning for program evaluation of graduate medical education training programs, (3) an explanation of the term "outcomes evaluation" including distinguishing between types of educational outcomes, and (4) a description of a five-step process of implementing the conceptual model.Recent accreditation standards for graduate medical education programs require a shift from a process-oriented to an outcomes-oriented model of evaluation. Accordingly, residency program directors must ensure compliance by undertaking comprehensive program evaluation procedures that demonstrate educational outcomes. Such procedures include attention to the need and focus of the evaluation; the evaluation methods to be used; and the documentation and presentation of evaluation results to key constituents. Involving teaching faculty and residents in developing a comprehensive evaluation program is vital to success. Regardless of philosophic debates pertaining to the appropriateness of the outcomes model for medical education, this approach appears likely to predominate in the foreseeable future particularly as related to the six general competencies of the physician. A practical, task-oriented approach will assist program directors in ensuring compliance with program evaluation standards.
(1)关于应用于医学教育的项目评估的文献简要概述;(2)供住院医师培训项目主任在规划研究生医学教育培训项目的项目评估时使用的面向任务的概念模型;(3)对“结果评估”一词的解释,包括区分教育结果的类型;以及(4)对实施该概念模型的五步过程的描述。最近的研究生医学教育项目认证标准要求从以过程为导向的评估模式转向以结果为导向的评估模式。因此,住院医师培训项目主任必须通过开展能证明教育结果的全面项目评估程序来确保合规。此类程序包括关注评估的需求和重点;要使用的评估方法;以及向关键人员记录和展示评估结果。让教师和住院医师参与制定全面的评估项目对成功至关重要。无论关于结果模型在医学教育中的适用性存在何种哲学辩论,这种方法在可预见的未来似乎都可能占主导地位,尤其是与医生的六项一般能力相关时。一种实用的、面向任务的方法将帮助项目主任确保符合项目评估标准。