• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

避免代价高昂的诉讼:实施合法招聘做法的十个步骤。

Avoid costly litigation: ten steps to implementing lawful hiring practices.

作者信息

Holmes Judith H

机构信息

Judith Holmes & Associates, LLC, 7887 E. Belleview Suite 1100, Englewood, CO 80111, USA.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2004 Jan;7(1):161-8.

PMID:16868630
Abstract

A malpractice claim or suit can have a devastating effect on a physician's practice and personal life. What is often overlooked is that an employment-related suit or EEOC charge also can extract a heavy toll, personally, professionally, and financially. The number of employment-related suits and claims has risen dramatically in the last few years. According to recent enforcement and litigation statistics released by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) (1), the total discrimination charges filed by individuals against their employers increased last year to 80,840--the highest level since the mid-1990's. According to the EEOC data, in 2001, employers paid $248 million in connection with charges of discrimination filed with the EEOC by job applicants, employees, and former employees. Employers paid an additional $47 million to the EEOC in connection with lawsuits filed against employers by the EEOC (2). This does not include the millions of dollars employers were forced to pay in settlements, judgments, costs, and attorney's fees incurred in connection with employment-related lawsuits filed in state and federal courts during the same period of time. Employment-related litigation is on the rise, and the healthcare industry is not immune. Physicians as employers can be a target for a wide range of employment-related claims and suits, such as breach of contract, invasion of privacy, sex, race, age, religious and age discrimination, and negligent hiring, just to name a few. The number of jury verdicts rendered against employers is increasing and the verdict awards are often staggering. In addition, defending these suits can be as expensive as defending a complicated malpractice suit. Even worse, employment discrimination suits and charges are generally not covered by malpractice, D & O, or general liability insurance policies, leaving the physician to cope with the financial burden of judgments, settlements, attorney's fees and litigation costs. Most employment-related disputes that lead to costly litigation would never have arisen if the employer had implemented more effective employment practices. Hiring mistakes in particular cause many costly legal battles. This article identifies legal issues that precipitate litigation and suggests ten steps physicians can take to implement lawful hiring practices that will reduce the risk of costly employment suits while improving office efficiency, morale, and productivity. NOTE: This article is intended as an overview of lawful hiring strategies, and is not a substitute for legal advice from experienced employment counsel. Applicable laws vary from state to state and appropriate procedures may depend on specific factual situations. This article is not, and should not be construed as, legal advice.

摘要

医疗事故索赔或诉讼可能会对医生的业务和个人生活产生毁灭性影响。人们常常忽视的是,与就业相关的诉讼或平等就业机会委员会(EEOC)的指控也会在个人、职业和经济方面造成沉重代价。在过去几年中,与就业相关的诉讼和索赔数量急剧上升。根据美国平等就业机会委员会(EEOC)发布的最新执法和诉讼统计数据(1),去年个人对雇主提出的歧视指控总数增至80,840起,这是自20世纪90年代中期以来的最高水平。根据EEOC的数据,2001年,雇主就求职者、员工和前员工向EEOC提出的歧视指控支付了2.48亿美元。雇主还就EEOC对雇主提起的诉讼向EEOC额外支付了4700万美元(2)。这还不包括雇主在同一时期因在州和联邦法院提起的与就业相关的诉讼而被迫支付的数百万美元和解金、判决金、费用和律师费。与就业相关的诉讼正在增加,医疗行业也未能幸免。作为雇主的医生可能会成为各种与就业相关的索赔和诉讼的目标,如违反合同、侵犯隐私、性别、种族、年龄、宗教和年龄歧视以及疏忽雇佣等等。针对雇主的陪审团裁决数量在增加,而且裁决赔偿金额往往惊人。此外,为这些诉讼辩护的费用可能与为复杂的医疗事故诉讼辩护一样高昂。更糟糕的是,就业歧视诉讼和指控通常不在医疗事故保险、董事及高级职员责任保险或一般责任保险范围内,这使得医生要应对判决、和解、律师费和诉讼费用的经济负担。如果雇主实施了更有效的就业做法,大多数导致代价高昂诉讼的与就业相关的纠纷本就不会发生。特别是招聘失误引发了许多代价高昂的法律纠纷。本文确定了引发诉讼的法律问题,并提出了医生可以采取的十个步骤,以实施合法的招聘做法,从而降低代价高昂的就业诉讼风险,同时提高办公室效率、士气和生产力。注意:本文旨在概述合法的招聘策略,并非替代经验丰富的就业顾问提供的法律建议。适用法律因州而异,适当的程序可能取决于具体事实情况。本文不是也不应被解释为法律建议。

相似文献

1
Avoid costly litigation: ten steps to implementing lawful hiring practices.避免代价高昂的诉讼:实施合法招聘做法的十个步骤。
Pain Physician. 2004 Jan;7(1):161-8.
2
Termination trauma: seven ways to minimize risk when discharging an employee.解雇创伤:员工离职时将风险降至最低的七种方法。
Pain Physician. 2004 Jul;7(3):349-55.
3
EEOC is making quick work of AIDS job-bias litigation. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.美国平等就业机会委员会正在迅速处理艾滋病就业歧视诉讼案件。平等就业机会委员会。
AIDS Policy Law. 1995 Sep 8;10(16):6.
4
EEOC policy statement aids workers seeking to avoid arbitration. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.美国平等就业机会委员会的政策声明有助于员工避免仲裁。美国平等就业机会委员会。
AIDS Policy Law. 1997 Sep 19;12(17):1, 10-1.
5
Rightful Discharge: Making "Termination" Mean It Is Really Over: Part 1-Issues and Legislation.
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2016 Jan/Mar;35(1):39-46. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0000000000000092.
6
Trends in malpractice litigation.医疗事故诉讼趋势
Yale J Biol Med. 1980 Jul-Aug;53(4):333-7.
7
Gender as a differential indicator of the employment discrimination experiences of Americans with multiple sclerosis.性别作为美国多发性硬化症患者就业歧视经历的差异指标。
Work. 2007;29(4):303-11.
8
Why a new malpractice crisis is coming.为何一场新的医疗事故危机即将来临。
Med Econ. 1979 Oct 29;56(22):109-14.
9
Urological medical malpractice.泌尿外科医疗事故
J Urol. 2001 May;165(5):1638-42.
10
Do falls and falls-injuries in hospital indicate negligent care -- and how big is the risk? A retrospective analysis of the NHS Litigation Authority Database of clinical negligence claims, resulting from falls in hospitals in England 1995 to 2006.医院内的跌倒及跌倒致伤是否表明存在护理疏忽——风险有多大?对英国国民医疗服务诉讼局1995年至2006年期间因医院内跌倒引发的临床疏忽索赔数据库进行的回顾性分析。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Dec;17(6):431-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.024703.