Mahajan Sandeep, Tiwari Sumit, Bhowmik Dipankar, Agarwal Sanjay K, Tiwari Suresh C, Dash Suresh C
Department of Nephrology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, 110029 New Delhi, India.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2006;38(2):391-6. doi: 10.1007/s11255-006-0053-y.
The spectrum of acute renal failure (ARF) in the elderly population and the factors predicting poor outcome in these patients are not well defined in literature. Identification of risk factors and poor prognostic markers in these patients can help in planning strategies to prevent ARF and to prioritise the utilization of sparse and expensive therapeutic modalities, especially in a developing country like ours. We retrospectively analyzed data of 454 elderly patients (age >or=60 years), detected having ARF in a tertiary care super-speciality hospital in North India, from April 2000 to March 2004. The mean age of this population was 66.4 years with 70.5% being male. 64% patients had more than one precipitating factors for ARF, with volume depletion being the most common precipitating factor (33% cases). Infection/sepsis (21.6%) and drugs (11.5%) were other important precipitating factors. 31.8% were recorded as having oliguric ARF (urine output <400 ml/day) and 33.5% required renal replacement therapy (RRT). Acute peritoneal dialysis was the most frequent form of RRT given (62.5%). Mortality was 41.2% (187 cases), of whom 56 (29.8%) died inspite of recovery from ARF. Among the survivors, 103 patients (22.7%) had complete renal recovery, 141 (31.1%) had partial renal recovery, while 23 (8.6%), remained dialysis dependent. The factors which were found to be associated with increased mortality were; age >or=70 years, presence of previous chronic illness, ARF precipitated by cardiac failure and infection, need for RRT, oliguria and increasing numbers of failed organs. To conclude, ARF among elderly is a common problem in nephrology practice at our institute and is responsible for 48.9% of nephrology admissions/consultations among elderly patients. Majority of these patients are prone to multiple renal insults. Underlying chronic illness, presence of cardiac failure and sepsis, oliguria, need for RRT and increasing number of organ failure is associated with poor outcome.
老年人群急性肾衰竭(ARF)的谱以及预测这些患者不良预后的因素在文献中尚未明确界定。识别这些患者的危险因素和不良预后标志物有助于制定预防ARF的策略,并优先利用稀缺且昂贵的治疗方式,尤其是在像我们这样的发展中国家。我们回顾性分析了2000年4月至2004年3月期间在印度北部一家三级医疗超级专科医院中检测出患有ARF的454例老年患者(年龄≥60岁)的数据。该人群的平均年龄为66.4岁,其中70.5%为男性。64%的患者有不止一个导致ARF的诱发因素,容量耗竭是最常见的诱发因素(33%的病例)。感染/脓毒症(21.6%)和药物(11.5%)是其他重要的诱发因素。31.8%记录为少尿型ARF(尿量<400毫升/天),33.5%需要肾脏替代治疗(RRT)。急性腹膜透析是最常用的RRT形式(62.5%)。死亡率为41.2%(187例),其中56例(29.8%)尽管从ARF中恢复但仍死亡。在幸存者中,103例患者(22.7%)肾功能完全恢复,141例(31.1%)部分恢复,而23例(8.6%)仍依赖透析。发现与死亡率增加相关的因素有:年龄≥70岁、既往有慢性疾病、由心力衰竭和感染诱发的ARF、需要RRT、少尿以及衰竭器官数量增加。总之,老年患者的ARF是我们研究所肾脏病实践中的常见问题,占老年患者肾脏病住院/会诊的48.9%。这些患者中的大多数容易受到多种肾脏损伤。潜在的慢性疾病、心力衰竭和脓毒症的存在、少尿、需要RRT以及器官衰竭数量增加与不良预后相关。