• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1996年至2003年美国门诊护理就诊中成人注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断与治疗

Diagnosis and treatment of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder at US ambulatory care visits from 1996 to 2003.

作者信息

Sankaranarayanan Jayashri, Puumala Susan E, Kratochvil Christopher J

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 986045 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Aug;22(8):1475-91. doi: 10.1185/030079906X112615.

DOI:10.1185/030079906X112615
PMID:16870073
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine national-estimates and characteristics of United States (US) ambulatory care visits made by adults, aged 18 years or older, with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) diagnosis, treatment patterns, and significant factors associated with adult-ADHD treatment.

METHODS

Retrospective analyses were conducted of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey over a combined 8-year period (1996-2003). Mental-health disorder (including ADHD) visits were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnostic codes. Significant factors of adult-ADHD treatment were determined in multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

An estimated total 10.5 million ambulatory-ADHD visits accounted for 3.5% of 301 million adult mental-health disorder visits. The census-adjusted visit rate was 0.3-0.4%. Increasing in numbers from the year 2000, ADHD visits were most often to psychiatrists, by Caucasian men, aged 18 to 40 years. Significantly fewer ADHD visits without, versus with, psychiatric comorbidity (mainly depression) received various treatments-- behavioral (46% vs. 83%), antidepressant (18% vs. 66%), or combined behavioral and ADHD-specific (stimulant or atomoxetine) pharmacotherapy (36% vs. 57%) respectively. However, more ADHD visits without than with psychiatric comorbidity received ADHD-specific pharmacotherapy alone (76% vs. 68%) or no treatment (14% vs. 6.5%). At ADHD visits, adjusting for gender, age, and US census geographic-region, psychiatric comorbidity (odds ratio [OR], 6.5, 95% confidence interval [Cl], 3.5-12.4, p < 0.05) and self-pay reimbursement-source (OR, 2.7, 95% Cl, 1.3-5.7, p < 0.05) significantly increased the likelihood of behavioral treatment. Insurance reimbursement-sources other than private and self-pay significantly decreased the likelihood of an ADHD-specific pharmacotherapy (OR, 0.4, 95% Cl, 0.2-0.7, p < 0.05) or any ADHD-treatment (OR, 0.2, 95% Cl, 0.1-0.5, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Adult-ADHD visits have increased in recent years, with a census-adjusted visit rate of 0.3-0.4%. Psychiatric comorbidity and reimbursement-source were associated with ADHD-treatment. Limited treatment may be a significant problem in US-ambulatory care. It is important to continue validation studies, educate providers, examine the efficacy of multimodal-treatments, and study insurance-related barriers to adult ADHD-treatment.

摘要

目的

确定美国18岁及以上患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的成年人的门诊就诊全国估计数及特征、治疗模式以及与成人ADHD治疗相关的重要因素。

方法

对国家门诊医疗调查和国家医院门诊医疗调查在1996 - 2003年这8年期间进行回顾性分析。使用国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本(ICD - 9 - CM)诊断代码识别精神健康障碍(包括ADHD)就诊情况。在多变量逻辑回归分析中确定成人ADHD治疗的重要因素。

结果

估计共有1050万次门诊ADHD就诊,占3.01亿次成人精神健康障碍就诊的3.5%。经人口普查调整后的就诊率为0.3% - 0.4%。自2000年起数量不断增加,ADHD就诊最常发生在18至40岁的白人男性的精神科医生处。与伴有精神科合并症(主要是抑郁症)的ADHD就诊相比,不伴有精神科合并症的ADHD就诊接受各种治疗的比例明显较低——行为治疗(46%对83%)、抗抑郁药治疗(18%对66%)或行为治疗与ADHD特异性(兴奋剂或托莫西汀)药物联合治疗(36%对57%)。然而,不伴有精神科合并症的ADHD就诊比伴有精神科合并症的就诊接受单纯ADHD特异性药物治疗的比例更高(76%对68%)或未接受治疗的比例更高(14%对6.5%)。在ADHD就诊中,在对性别、年龄和美国人口普查地理区域进行调整后,精神科合并症(优势比[OR]为6.5,95%置信区间[Cl]为3.5 - 12.4,p < 0.05)和自费报销来源(OR为2.7,95% Cl为1.3 - 5.7,p < 0.05)显著增加了行为治疗的可能性。除私人和自费之外的保险报销来源显著降低了ADHD特异性药物治疗(OR为0.4,95% Cl为0.2 - 0.7,p < 0.05)或任何ADHD治疗(OR为0.2,95% Cl为0.1 - 0.5,p < 0.05)的可能性。

结论

近年来成人ADHD就诊有所增加,经人口普查调整后的就诊率为0.3% - 0.4%。精神科合并症和报销来源与ADHD治疗相关。有限的治疗可能是美国门诊医疗中的一个重大问题。继续进行验证研究、对医疗服务提供者进行教育、检查多模式治疗的疗效以及研究与成人ADHD治疗相关的保险障碍很重要。

相似文献

1
Diagnosis and treatment of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder at US ambulatory care visits from 1996 to 2003.1996年至2003年美国门诊护理就诊中成人注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断与治疗
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Aug;22(8):1475-91. doi: 10.1185/030079906X112615.
2
Antipsychotic use at adult ambulatory care visits by patients with mental health disorders in the United States, 1996-2003: national estimates and associated factors.1996 - 2003年美国心理健康障碍患者在成人门诊护理就诊时的抗精神病药物使用情况:全国估计数及相关因素
Clin Ther. 2007 Apr;29(4):723-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.04.017.
3
Pharmacotherapy with atomoxetine for US children and adolescents.美国儿童和青少年使用托莫西汀的药物治疗。
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Jul-Sep;19(3):175-80. doi: 10.1080/10401230701465244.
4
Epidemiology and characteristics of emergency departments visits by US adults with psychiatric disorder and antipsychotic mention from 2000 to 2004.2000年至2004年美国患有精神疾病并提及使用抗精神病药物的成年人急诊科就诊情况的流行病学及特征
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Jun;23(6):1375-85. doi: 10.1185/030079907X187900.
5
Physician and patient factors associated with the prescribing of medications for sleep difficulties that are associated with high abuse potential or are expensive: an analysis of data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey for 1996-2001.与开具具有高滥用潜力或昂贵的治疗睡眠困难药物相关的医生和患者因素:对1996 - 2001年国家门诊医疗护理调查数据的分析
Clin Ther. 2005 Dec;27(12):1970-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.12.008.
6
Prevalence, recognition, and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a national sample of US children.美国儿童全国样本中注意力缺陷多动障碍的患病率、识别与治疗情况
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Sep;161(9):857-64. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.9.857.
7
Prevalence of the prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications at ambulatory care visits by elderly patients covered by the Taiwanese National Health Insurance program.台湾全民健康保险计划覆盖的老年患者在门诊就诊时开具潜在不适当药物的情况。
Clin Ther. 2009 Aug;31(8):1859-70. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.023.
8
Comorbidity of rosacea and depression: an analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and National Hospital Ambulatory Care Survey--Outpatient Department data collected by the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics from 1995 to 2002.酒渣鼻与抑郁症的共病情况:对美国国家卫生统计中心1995年至2002年收集的国家门诊医疗护理调查和国家医院门诊护理调查——门诊部数据的分析。
Br J Dermatol. 2005 Dec;153(6):1176-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06895.x.
9
National estimates and factors associated with medication treatment for childhood attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.全国儿童注意力缺陷/多动障碍药物治疗的估计数据及相关因素。
Pediatrics. 2007 Feb;119 Suppl 1:S99-106. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2089O.
10
Dental complaints in emergency departments: a national perspective.急诊科的牙科投诉:全国视角
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 Jul;42(1):93-9. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.234.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence-Based Considerations and Recommendations for Athletic Trainers Caring for Patients With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.针对照顾注意力缺陷/多动障碍患者的运动训练师的循证考量与建议。
J Athl Train. 2016 Oct;51(10):813-820. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-51.12.11. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
2
Why the Diagnosis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Matters.为什么注意缺陷多动障碍的诊断很重要。
Front Psychiatry. 2015 Nov 26;6:168. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00168. eCollection 2015.
3
Are prescription stimulants "smart pills"? The epidemiology and cognitive neuroscience of prescription stimulant use by normal healthy individuals.
处方兴奋剂是“聪明药”吗?正常健康个体使用处方兴奋剂的流行病学和认知神经科学。
Psychol Bull. 2011 Sep;137(5):717-41. doi: 10.1037/a0023825.
4
Long-term outcomes with medications for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: current status of knowledge.治疗注意缺陷多动障碍药物的长期疗效:现有知识状况。
CNS Drugs. 2011 Jul;25(7):539-54. doi: 10.2165/11589380-000000000-00000.
5
Management of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults: focus on methylphenidate hydrochloride.成人注意缺陷多动障碍的管理:重点关注盐酸哌甲酯。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2009;5:421-32. doi: 10.2147/ndt.s4101. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
6
Potential adverse effects of amphetamine treatment on brain and behavior: a review.苯丙胺治疗对大脑和行为的潜在不良影响:综述
Mol Psychiatry. 2009 Feb;14(2):123-42. doi: 10.1038/mp.2008.90. Epub 2008 Aug 12.