McCann D M, Stephens P J
Department of Chemistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-0482, USA.
J Org Chem. 2006 Aug 4;71(16):6074-98. doi: 10.1021/jo060755+.
In principle, the absolute configuration (AC) of a chiral molecule can be deduced from its optical rotation (OR) and/or its electronic circular dichroism (ECD). In practice, this requires reliable methodologies for predicting OR and ECD. The recent application of ab initio time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) to the calculation of transparent spectral region OR and ECD has greatly enhanced the reliability with which these phenomena can be predicted. TDDFT calculations of OR and ECD are being increasingly utilized in determining ACs. Nevertheless, such calculations are not perfect, and as a result, ACs determined are not 100% reliable. In this paper, we examine the reliability of the TDDFT methods in the case of chiral alkenes. Sodium d line specific rotations, [alpha]D, are predicted for 26 conformationally rigid alkenes of known AC, ranging in size from 5 to 20 C atoms, and with [alpha]D values in the range of 0-500. The mean absolute deviation of predicted [alpha]D values from experimental values is 28.7. With one exception, beta-pinene, the signs of [alpha]D are correctly predicted. Errors in calculated [alpha]D values are approximately random. Our results define a "zone of indeterminacy" within which calculated [alpha]D values cannot be used to determine ACs with >95% confidence. TDDFT ECD spectra are predicted for eight of the alkenes and compared to experimental spectra. Agreement ranges from modestly good to poor, leading to the conclusion that TDDFT calculations of ECD spectra are not yet of sufficient accuracy to routinely provide highly reliable ACs. TDDFT OR calculations for two conformationally flexible alkenes, 3-tert-butylcyclohexene and trans-4-carene, are also reported. For the former, predicted rotations are incorrect in sign over the range 589-365 nm. It is possible that the AC of this molecule has been incorrectly assigned.
原则上,手性分子的绝对构型(AC)可从其旋光性(OR)和/或电子圆二色性(ECD)推导得出。实际上,这需要可靠的方法来预测OR和ECD。从头算含时密度泛函理论(TDDFT)最近应用于透明光谱区域OR和ECD的计算,极大地提高了预测这些现象的可靠性。OR和ECD的TDDFT计算在确定AC方面的应用越来越广泛。然而,此类计算并不完美,因此,所确定的AC并非100%可靠。在本文中,我们研究了手性烯烃情况下TDDFT方法的可靠性。预测了26种已知AC的构象刚性烯烃的钠D线比旋光度[α]D,其碳原子数从5到20不等,[α]D值范围为0至500。预测的[α]D值与实验值的平均绝对偏差为28.7。除了β-蒎烯这一例外情况,[α]D的符号均被正确预测。计算得到的[α]D值误差大致是随机的。我们的结果定义了一个“不确定区域”,在该区域内,计算得到的[α]D值不能用于以>95%的置信度确定AC。预测了其中8种烯烃的TDDFT ECD光谱,并与实验光谱进行了比较。吻合程度从中等良好到较差不等,得出的结论是,ECD光谱的TDDFT计算精度尚不足以常规地提供高度可靠的AC。还报道了两种构象灵活的烯烃3-叔丁基环己烯和反式-4-蒈烯的TDDFT OR计算。对于前者,在589 - 365 nm范围内预测的旋光方向错误。该分子的AC有可能被错误指定。