Serdarević Nafija, Malesić Ivan, Kozjek Franc
Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Biochemistry, Sarajevo University Clinics Center, 71000 Sarajevo, Bolnicka 25, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2006 May;6(2):32-6. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2006.3191.
The lithium ions concentration in human serum was determined using Dry-slide technology Vitros 250 Analyser (Ortho Clinical Diagnostic), atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) method Perkin Elmer 403 and ion-selective electrode (ISE) potentiometry AVL 9181. We compared lithium ions results in sample sera between these methods. Our reference method was AAS. We analyzed lithium ions concentration in 23 sera samples of patients after oral administration of lithium carbonate (3x 300mg) Jadran, Galen Laboratory Rijeka, by dry-slide technology, AAS and ISE methods. The quality control, precision, reproducibility and accuracy for Vitros dry slide technology were assessed. We established that the main difference between AAS method and dry slide technology was not statistically significant at p< 0.05 according to Student t-test. Therefore, the dry slide technology may be a useful alternative or it may even replace other methods, such as AAS. The main difference between dry slide technology and ISE methods was statistically significant at p<0.05 using Student t-test. By ISE method, we obtained considerably higher results, which may be explained by the presence of electrolytes or medicaments interfering with lithium ions.
采用干式载片技术(Vitros 250分析仪,奥瑟临床诊断公司)、原子吸收光谱法(AAS,珀金埃尔默403型)以及离子选择性电极(ISE)电位分析法(AVL 9181型)测定人血清中的锂离子浓度。我们比较了这些方法在血清样本中锂离子的检测结果。我们的参考方法是AAS。我们采用干式载片技术、AAS和ISE方法分析了23例口服碳酸锂(3×300mg,亚得兰,加伦实验室,里耶卡)患者的血清样本中的锂离子浓度。评估了Vitros干式载片技术的质量控制、精密度、重现性和准确性。根据学生t检验,我们确定AAS方法与干式载片技术之间的主要差异在p<0.05时无统计学意义。因此,干式载片技术可能是一种有用的替代方法,甚至可能取代其他方法,如AAS。使用学生t检验,干式载片技术与ISE方法之间的主要差异在p<0.05时有统计学意义。通过ISE方法,我们得到的结果要高得多,这可能是由于存在干扰锂离子的电解质或药物所致。