Amin M S, Harrison R L, Weinstein P
Department of Oral Health Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2006 Sep;16(5):309-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2006.00750.x.
Caries relapse after treatment of early childhood caries (ECC) under general anaesthesia (GA) has been frequently reported. This research used a qualitative method of inquiry to explore parents' experience of their child's treatment under GA, and their perception of the impact of this treatment on their child.
The participants were parents whose children had recently undergone dental rehabilitation under GA. Data was collected by semistructured, open-ended interviews scheduled at the postoperative appointment. Interviews were audio-taped, transcribed, checked and coded into a qualitative computer software program for analysis. Data collection and analysis were done simultaneously, and the interview guide was modified based on responses.
Parents were troubled that their child needed a GA and appeared aware of the complications. While some parents felt 'guilty' and struggled to accept this mode of treatment for their child, others felt 'blameless', and were convinced that the GA was 'preferable' for their child and superior to conventional treatment. Nonetheless, all parents reported some levels of anxiety during the GA; they expressed their emotions with 'fear', 'worry' and 'concern'. After the GA, improvement was reported by most parents in their child's amount of dental pain, sleeping pattern, eating habits and acceptance of parental toothbrushing. The most common changes in their child's behaviour mentioned by parents were increased toothbrushing and decreased consumption of sugary foods. Several children who had had primary teeth extracted were distressed as a result of this 'loss'.
The general anaesthetic experience was troubling in a variety of ways for both parents and children. However, an 'early' and positive outcome of the GA was a reported improvement in dental health practices. Parents were more positive about maintaining the health of primary teeth and now knew how to take care of their child's teeth. Future exploration is required to reveal if and how the GA experience will affect long-term preventive behaviours.
全身麻醉(GA)下治疗幼儿龋(ECC)后龋齿复发的情况屡有报道。本研究采用定性研究方法,探讨家长对孩子在全身麻醉下接受治疗的体验,以及他们对这种治疗对孩子影响的看法。
参与者为其孩子近期在全身麻醉下接受牙齿修复治疗的家长。数据通过术后预约时进行的半结构化、开放式访谈收集。访谈进行录音、转录、核对,并编码到定性计算机软件程序中进行分析。数据收集和分析同时进行,访谈指南根据回答进行修改。
家长们对孩子需要全身麻醉感到困扰,并且似乎意识到了相关并发症。一些家长感到“内疚”,难以接受孩子采用这种治疗方式,而另一些家长则觉得“无过错”,并坚信全身麻醉对孩子“更有利”,优于传统治疗。尽管如此,所有家长都表示在全身麻醉期间有一定程度的焦虑;他们用“恐惧”“担忧”和“关切”来表达自己的情绪。全身麻醉后,大多数家长报告孩子的牙痛程度、睡眠模式、饮食习惯以及对家长刷牙的接受程度有所改善。家长提到孩子行为最常见的变化是刷牙次数增加和含糖食物摄入量减少。几个拔除了乳牙的孩子因这种“缺失”而苦恼。
全身麻醉经历对家长和孩子都在多方面造成困扰。然而,全身麻醉的一个“早期”且积极的结果是据报道口腔健康行为有所改善。家长对维护乳牙健康更加积极,并且现在知道如何照顾孩子的牙齿。未来需要进一步探索以揭示全身麻醉经历是否以及如何影响长期预防行为。