Wang N Ewen, Kiernan Michaela, Golzari Mana, Gisondi Michael A
Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Aug;13(8):840-7. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.04.021.
To identify and characterize subgroups of a pediatric population at risk of poor emergency department (ED) aftercare compliance.
This was a prospective, cohort study conducted at a university hospital ED with a 2003 pediatric census of 11,040 patients. A convenience sample of 461 children was enrolled. The study follow-up rate was 97%. The primary outcomes were guardian compliance with instructions for physician follow-up appointment and with obtaining prescribed medications. Predictors of compliance outcomes were analyzed by using recursive partitioning to describe population subgroups at risk of poor compliance.
Only 60.4% of patient guardians followed up with instructions to see a physician. Children with private insurance were more likely to follow up than were children without private insurance (76.8% vs. 46.5%, p < 0.001). Of children with private insurance, those with high-acuity diagnoses were more likely to follow up than were patients with low-acuity diagnoses (80.0% vs. 38.5%, p < 0.001). Of children who were considered underinsured (defined as publicly insured or uninsured), those with English-speaking guardians were more likely to follow up than were those with non-English-speaking guardians (58.0% vs. 40.0%, p < 0.05). Only 63.3% of patient guardians obtained prescribed medications. Privately insured children were more likely to obtain medications than were underinsured children (71.0% vs. 58.0%, p < 0.05). Descriptive profiles of the subgroups revealed that those with lower socioeconomic status were at greatest risk of poor aftercare compliance.
Compliance with ED aftercare instructions remains a challenge. Health insurance disparities are associated with poor ED aftercare compliance in our pediatric population. Interventions aimed at improving compliance could be targeted to specific subgroups on the basis of their descriptive profiles.
识别并描述有急诊科(ED)后续护理依从性差风险的儿科人群亚组特征。
这是一项在大学医院急诊科进行的前瞻性队列研究,2003年儿科普查患者有11040例。纳入了461名儿童的便利样本。研究随访率为97%。主要结局是监护人对医生随访预约指示的依从性以及获取处方药物的情况。通过递归划分分析依从性结局的预测因素,以描述依从性差风险的人群亚组。
只有60.4%的患者监护人遵照指示去看医生。有私人保险的儿童比没有私人保险的儿童更有可能进行随访(76.8%对46.5%,p<0.001)。在有私人保险的儿童中,病情严重程度高的诊断患儿比病情严重程度低的诊断患儿更有可能进行随访(80.0%对38.5%,p<0.001)。在被认为保险不足的儿童(定义为有公共保险或无保险)中,监护人说英语的儿童比监护人不说英语的儿童更有可能进行随访(58.0%对40.0%,p<0.05)。只有63.3%的患者监护人获取了处方药物。有私人保险的儿童比保险不足的儿童更有可能获取药物(71.0%对58.0%,p<0.05)。亚组的描述性概况显示,社会经济地位较低的儿童后续护理依从性差的风险最大。
对急诊科后续护理指示的依从性仍然是一项挑战。在我们的儿科人群中,医疗保险差异与急诊科后续护理依从性差有关。基于其描述性概况,针对特定亚组的改善依从性的干预措施可能是有针对性的。