• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The effectiveness of graphic organizers for three classifications of secondary students in content area classes.

作者信息

Horton S V, Lovitt T C, Bergerud D

机构信息

University of Washington.

出版信息

J Learn Disabil. 1990 Jan;23(1):12-22, 29. doi: 10.1177/002221949002300107.

DOI:10.1177/002221949002300107
PMID:1688604
Abstract

Previous research concerning the graphic or visual display of information with academically handicapped students has not addressed the instructional conditions that exist in mainstream settings. This article investigates the effectiveness of graphic organizers for three classifications of secondary students enrolled in content area classes: students with learning disabilities, remedial students, and students in regular education. The results of three separate experiments indicated that graphic organizers, whether teacher-directed, student-directed with text references, or student-directed with clues, produced significantly higher performance than self-study for each group of students. Several practical issues involving the use of graphic organizers with heterogeneous groups of secondary students are discussed.

摘要

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of graphic organizers for three classifications of secondary students in content area classes.
J Learn Disabil. 1990 Jan;23(1):12-22, 29. doi: 10.1177/002221949002300107.
2
Student error patterns as a function of curriculum design: teaching fractions to remedial high school students and high school students with learning disabilities.作为课程设计函数的学生错误模式:向高中补习生和有学习障碍的高中生教授分数
J Learn Disabil. 1990 Jan;23(1):23-9. doi: 10.1177/002221949002300108.
3
Teaching social studies to high school students with academic handicaps in a mainstreamed setting: effects of a computerized study guide.
J Learn Disabil. 1989 Feb;22(2):102-7. doi: 10.1177/002221948902200205.
4
Matching three classifications of secondary students to differential levels of study guides.
J Learn Disabil. 1991 Nov;24(9):518-29. doi: 10.1177/002221949102400904.
5
Graphic organizers and their effects on the reading comprehension of students with LD: a synthesis of research.概念图及其对学习障碍学生阅读理解的影响:研究综述
J Learn Disabil. 2004 Mar-Apr;37(2):105-18. doi: 10.1177/00222194040370020201.
6
Mainstream Experiences for Learning Disabled students (Project MELD): preliminary report.学习障碍学生的主流学习体验(MELD项目):初步报告。
Except Child. 1990 Oct-Nov;57(2):176-85.
7
Teaching complex content to learning disabled students: the role of technology.向学习障碍学生教授复杂内容:技术的作用。
Except Child. 1989 Apr;55(6):524-33. doi: 10.1177/001440298905500606.
8
Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD: a research synthesis.提高学习障碍学生对说明文的理解:一项研究综述。
J Learn Disabil. 2007 May-Jun;40(3):210-25. doi: 10.1177/00222194070400030301.
9
The form and substance of secondary resource models: content area versus skill instruction.二级资源模型的形式与实质:内容领域与技能指导
J Learn Disabil. 1991 Oct;24(8):467-70. doi: 10.1177/002221949102400804.
10
Strategies to facilitate learning among nursing students with learning disabilities.
Nurse Educ. 2008 May-Jun;33(3):105-6. doi: 10.1097/01.NNE.0000312187.28519.48.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evidence is in the Design.证据就在设计之中。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2021 Sep 3;44(2-3):195-223. doi: 10.1007/s40614-021-00309-8. eCollection 2021 Sep.