Diaz-Sanchez David, Rumold Robert, Gong Henry
Hart and Louis Laboratory, Division Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Aug;118(2):441-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.04.047. Epub 2006 Jun 6.
Despite widespread perceptions that environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) is a potent risk factor for allergic airway disease, epidemiologic studies studying this have been equivocal. There is a clear need for experimental studies to address these questions.
We directly tested the hypothesis that ETS could interact with allergen in human beings to alter immune responses and promote changes associated with allergic airway disease.
In a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study, 19 nonsmoking volunteers with ragweed allergy underwent nasal lavage followed by controlled chamber exposures to 2 hours ETS or clean air followed by another nasal lavage. Subjects immediately randomly received nasal challenge with either ragweed allergen or placebo (300 microL saline). Lavages were also performed 10 minutes, 24 hours, and 4 and 7 days after challenge and IgE, cytokines, and histamine measured. The other arms of the study were spaced at least 6 weeks apart.
Environmental tobacco smoke promoted the production of allergen-specific IgE, the hallmark of allergic disease in nasal lavage fluid. Four days after exposure to ETS/ragweed, levels were on average 16.6-fold higher than after clean air/ragweed challenge. In addition, ETS (vs air) promoted the induction of a T(H)2-cytokine nasal milieu (increased IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 and decreased IFN-gamma production), characteristic of an active allergic response. Moreover, nasal histamine levels were 3.3-fold greater after ETS/ragweed challenge than after clean air/ragweed challenge.
These studies provide the first experimental evidence that secondhand smoke can exacerbate allergic responses in human beings.
The studies suggest that patients with allergies should avoid tobacco smoke.
尽管人们普遍认为环境烟草烟雾(ETS)是过敏性气道疾病的一个重要危险因素,但针对此进行的流行病学研究结果并不明确。显然需要开展实验研究来解决这些问题。
我们直接检验了这样一个假设,即环境烟草烟雾可在人体内与过敏原相互作用,改变免疫反应,并促进与过敏性气道疾病相关的变化。
在一项随机、安慰剂对照的交叉研究中,19名对豚草过敏的非吸烟志愿者接受鼻腔灌洗,然后在受控室内暴露于2小时的环境烟草烟雾或清洁空气中,之后再进行一次鼻腔灌洗。受试者随即随机接受豚草过敏原或安慰剂(300微升生理盐水)的鼻腔激发。在激发后10分钟、24小时、4天和7天也进行灌洗,并检测免疫球蛋白E、细胞因子和组胺。研究的其他分组之间至少间隔6周。
环境烟草烟雾促进了鼻腔灌洗液中过敏原特异性免疫球蛋白E的产生,这是过敏性疾病的标志。在暴露于环境烟草烟雾/豚草后4天,其水平平均比暴露于清洁空气/豚草激发后高16.6倍。此外,环境烟草烟雾(与空气相比)促进了辅助性T细胞2型细胞因子鼻腔环境的诱导(白细胞介素-4、白细胞介素-5和白细胞介素-13增加,干扰素-γ产生减少),这是活跃过敏反应的特征。此外,环境烟草烟雾/豚草激发后的鼻腔组胺水平比清洁空气/豚草激发后高3.3倍。
这些研究提供了首个实验证据,表明二手烟可加剧人体的过敏反应。
这些研究表明,过敏患者应避免接触烟草烟雾。