• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死早期护理并非越多越好:基于行政数据库的前瞻性队列分析

More is not better in the early care of acute myocardial infarction: a prospective cohort analysis on administrative databases.

作者信息

Van Brabandt Hans, Camberlin Cécile, Vrijens France, Parmentier Yves, Ramaekers Dirk, Bonneux Luc

机构信息

Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE), Wetstraat 155, B-1040, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2006 Nov;27(22):2649-54. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl161. Epub 2006 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl161
PMID:16891380
Abstract

AIMS

To assess the outcome and costs of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after initial admission to hospitals with or without catheterization facilities in Belgium.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From a nationwide hospital register, we retrieved the data of 34 961 patients discharged during 1999-2001 with a principal diagnosis of AMI. They were initially admitted to hospitals without catheterization facilities (A), with diagnostic (B1) or interventional catheterization facilities (B2). Mortality has been recorded till the end of 2003 and re-admissions till the end of 2001. The mortality hazard ratio and 95% CI of 5 years mortality of A vs. B2 was 1.01 (0.97, 1.06) and of B1 vs. B2 was 1.03 (0.98, 1.09). Re-admission rates and 95% CI for cardiovascular reason per 100 patient-years were 23.5 (22.7, 24.3) for A, 23.8 (22.5, 25.1) for B1, and 22.0 (21.2, 22.9) for B2. The mean cost in hospital of a patient at low risk with a single stay was in A 4072 euro (median: 3,861; IQR: 4467-3476), in B1 5083 euro (median: 5153; IQR: 5769-4340), and in B2 7741 euro (median: 7553; IQR: 8211-7298).

CONCLUSION

Services with catheterization facilities compared with services without them showed no better health outcomes, but delivered more expensive care.

摘要

目的

评估比利时急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者在初次入住有或无导管插入设备的医院后的治疗结果及费用。

方法与结果

从全国医院登记处,我们获取了1999 - 2001年期间出院的34961例主要诊断为AMI患者的数据。他们最初入住无导管插入设备的医院(A组)、有诊断性(B1组)或介入性导管插入设备的医院(B2组)。记录了直至2003年底的死亡率以及直至2001年底的再入院情况。A组与B2组5年死亡率的死亡风险比及95%可信区间为1.01(0.97,1.06),B1组与B2组为1.03(0.98,1.09)。每100患者年因心血管原因的再入院率及95%可信区间,A组为23.5(22.7,24.3),B1组为23.8(22.5,25.1),B2组为22.0(21.2,22.9)。单次住院的低风险患者的平均住院费用,A组为4072欧元(中位数:3861;四分位数间距:4467 - 3476),B1组为5083欧元(中位数:5153;四分位数间距:5769 - 4340),B2组为7741欧元(中位数:7553;四分位数间距:8211 - 7298)。

结论

有导管插入设备的医疗服务与无导管插入设备的医疗服务相比,并未显示出更好的健康结果,但提供的护理费用更高。

相似文献

1
More is not better in the early care of acute myocardial infarction: a prospective cohort analysis on administrative databases.急性心肌梗死早期护理并非越多越好:基于行政数据库的前瞻性队列分析
Eur Heart J. 2006 Nov;27(22):2649-54. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl161. Epub 2006 Aug 4.
2
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention compared with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction transferred from community hospitals.与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗相比,在从社区医院转诊的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,实施辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的有效性和成本效益。
Clin Ther. 2006 Jul;28(7):1054-62. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.07.007.
3
Transfer rates from nonprocedure hospitals after initial admission and outcomes among elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.非手术医院老年急性心肌梗死患者初始住院后的转归及其预后
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Feb 1;174(2):213-22. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.11944.
4
Outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted in hospitals with or without catheterization laboratory: results from the HELIOS registry.有或没有导管实验室的医院收治的急性心肌梗死患者的结局:来自HELIOS注册研究的结果。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009 Feb;16(1):85-90. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e32831e954e.
5
Interhospital transfer for early revascularization in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock--a report from the SHould we revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK? (SHOCK) trial and registry.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者早期血运重建的院间转运——来自“心源性休克时我们应该对闭塞冠状动脉进行血运重建吗?(SHOCK)”试验及注册研究的报告
Am Heart J. 2006 Oct;152(4):686-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.06.010.
6
Outcomes of myocardial infarction in hospitals with percutaneous coronary intervention facilities.具备经皮冠状动脉介入治疗设备的医院中急性心肌梗死的治疗结果
Arch Intern Med. 2007 May 14;167(9):913-20. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.9.913.
7
Modalities of treatment and 30-day outcomes of unselected patients older than 75 years with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: data from the BLITZ study.75岁以上非选择性急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的治疗方式及30天预后:来自BLITZ研究的数据
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2008 Oct;9(10):1045-51. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e32830eb6eb.
8
[Reduction of in-hospital mortality and improved secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction. First results from the registry of secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction (SAMI)].[降低急性心肌梗死后的院内死亡率并改善二级预防。急性心肌梗死后二级预防登记研究(SAMI)的初步结果]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2007 Jul 30;132(30):1559-66. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-984934.
9
Transfer with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban for primary percutaneous coronary intervention vs. on-site thrombolysis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI): a randomized open-label study for patients admitted to community hospitals.在社区医院收治的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中,比较使用糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂替罗非班转运至行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与就地溶栓治疗的效果:一项随机开放标签研究
Eur Heart J. 2007 Oct;28(20):2438-48. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm369. Epub 2007 Sep 20.
10
Emergency department physician activation of the catheterization laboratory and immediate transfer to an immediately available catheterization laboratory reduce door-to-balloon time in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.急诊科医生启动导管室并立即转至随时可用的导管室可缩短ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的门球时间。
Circulation. 2007 Jul 3;116(1):67-76. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.677401. Epub 2007 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The economic burden of ischaemic heart diseases on health systems: a systematic review.缺血性心脏病对卫生系统的经济负担:一项系统评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Feb 12;10(2):e015043. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015043.
2
The clinical and economic consequences of practice style variations in common surgical interventions: A protocol for systematic review.常见外科手术干预中实践方式差异的临床和经济后果:一项系统评价方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(42):e12439. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012439.
3
Do inter-hospital comparisons of in-hospital, acute myocardial infarction case-fatality rates serve the purpose of fostering quality improvement? An evaluative study.
院内急性心肌梗死病死率的院内跨院比较是否有助于促进质量改进?一项评估性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Dec 8;10:334. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-334.
4
Mortality in 272 European regions, 2002-2004. An update.2002-2004 年 272 个欧洲地区的死亡率。更新。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2010 Feb;25(2):77-85. doi: 10.1007/s10654-009-9415-y. Epub 2009 Dec 22.