Rosenberg Victor A, Eglinton Gary S, Rauch Eden R, Skupski Daniel W
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Oct;195(4):1095-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.051. Epub 2006 Aug 8.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether continuous insulin infusion provides a greater degree of intrapartum maternal glycemic control than rotating between glucose and non-glucose containing intravenous fluids.
Laboring patients with pregestational or gestational diabetes were recruited and randomized to an "insulin drip" or "rotating fluids" protocol. The primary outcome measure was mean maternal capillary blood glucose (CBG) levels (mg/dL). Power analysis indicated that 16 patients were needed in each arm to find a difference of 10 mg/dL.
Fifteen patients were randomized to the rotating fluids protocol and 21 patients to an insulin drip. There was no difference in mean intrapartum maternal CBG levels (103.9 +/- 8.7 mg/dL and 103.2 +/- 17.9 mg/dL in the rotating fluids and insulin drip group, respectively, P = .89). Neonatal outcomes were also similar between the 2 treatment groups.
In patients with insulin requiring gestational diabetes, intrapartum glycemic control may be comparable with a standard adjusted insulin drip or a rotation of intravenous fluids between glucose and non-glucose containing fluids.
本研究旨在确定持续胰岛素输注在产时对母体血糖的控制程度是否高于在含葡萄糖和不含葡萄糖的静脉输液之间轮换。
招募患有孕前或妊娠期糖尿病的临产患者,并将其随机分为“胰岛素滴注”或“轮换输液”方案组。主要结局指标是母体毛细血管血糖(CBG)平均水平(mg/dL)。功效分析表明,每组需要16名患者才能发现10mg/dL的差异。
15名患者被随机分配到轮换输液方案组,21名患者被分配到胰岛素滴注组。产时母体CBG平均水平无差异(轮换输液组和胰岛素滴注组分别为103.9±8.7mg/dL和103.2±17.9mg/dL,P = 0.89)。两个治疗组的新生儿结局也相似。
在需要胰岛素治疗的妊娠期糖尿病患者中,产时血糖控制采用标准调整胰岛素滴注或在含葡萄糖和不含葡萄糖的液体之间轮换静脉输液可能具有可比性。