Suppr超能文献

压疮的治疗:一项比较证据与实践的研究结果

Treatment of pressure ulcers: results of a study comparing evidence and practice.

作者信息

Helberg Dorothea, Mertens Elke, Halfens Ruud Jg, Dassen Theo

机构信息

Centre for the Humanities and Health Science, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Schumannstr. 20/21, Berlin 10098, Germany.

出版信息

Ostomy Wound Manage. 2006 Aug;52(8):60-72.

Abstract

Pressure ulcers remain prevalent in hospitals and nursing homes despite the availability of evidence-based guidelines for prevention and care. To evaluate the level of evidence-based literature and its application in pressure ulcer treatment, a search was conducted of relevant English and German articles published between 1994 and 2002 using the key terms decubitus ulcer and its synonyms in different combinations with therapy, wound management, and specific wound treatment terms. Results were compared to wound dressing use data obtained from two pressure ulcer prevalence surveys conducted in 51 hospitals and 15 nursing homes in Germany in 2001 and 2002 (N = 11,584). Dressing usage evidence levels were reviewed and reported usage was classified as consistent or not consistent with existing guidelines or as evidence base unknown. Pressure ulcer prevalence rates ranged from 10.6% to 13.2% and the majority of pressure ulcers (60%) were Grade 1. In nursing homes, dressing selection was consistent with current evidence in 6.8% of Grade 1 and 27.8% of Grade 2 ulcers. In acute care facilities, dressing selection in 2001 and 2002 was consistent with current evidence in 21.6% and 38.5%, respectively, of Grade 1 ulcers and in 40.2% and 51.5%, respectively, of Grade 2 ulcers. Although strong evidence exists to support the use of dressings that facilitate moist wound healing, barely half of the grade 3 and grade 4 ulcers in all care settings received this treatment. While dressing classification limitations restricted the ability to analyze all treatment methods used, findings suggest that clinician knowledge deficits regarding evidence-based treatments remain. The literature review results also indicate the level of evidence for many practice recommendations remains low. Studies to increase evidence levels of pressure ulcer prevention and treatment as well as programs to improve awareness and implementation of current evidence-based guidelines are needed.

摘要

尽管有循证预防和护理指南,但压疮在医院和养老院中仍然普遍存在。为了评估循证文献的水平及其在压疮治疗中的应用,我们使用关键词“褥疮”及其同义词与“治疗”、“伤口处理”和特定伤口治疗术语的不同组合,检索了1994年至2002年间发表的相关英文和德文文章。将结果与2001年和2002年在德国51家医院和15家养老院进行的两次压疮患病率调查(N = 11,584)中获得的伤口敷料使用数据进行比较。对敷料使用的证据水平进行了审查,并将报告的使用情况分类为与现有指南一致或不一致,或证据基础不明。压疮患病率在10.6%至13.2%之间,大多数压疮(60%)为1级。在养老院中,1级溃疡的6.8%和2级溃疡的27.8%的敷料选择与当前证据一致。在急性护理机构中,2001年和2002年1级溃疡的敷料选择分别有21.6%和38.5%与当前证据一致,2级溃疡的敷料选择分别有40.2%和51.5%与当前证据一致。尽管有强有力的证据支持使用促进伤口湿性愈合的敷料,但在所有护理环境中,只有不到一半的3级和4级溃疡接受了这种治疗。虽然敷料分类的局限性限制了分析所有使用的治疗方法的能力,但研究结果表明,临床医生在循证治疗方面的知识缺陷仍然存在。文献综述结果还表明,许多实践建议的证据水平仍然很低。需要开展研究以提高压疮预防和治疗的证据水平,以及开展项目以提高对当前循证指南的认识和实施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验