Armingeat T, Brondino R, Pham T, Legré V, Lafforgue P
Service de Rhumatologie (Sud), Hôpital de la Conception, 147, Boulevard Baille, 13385, Marseille Cedex 05, France.
Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(11):1659-65. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0169-z. Epub 2006 Aug 8.
We performed a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial comparing intravenous pamidronate and placebo for pain relief in recent osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCF).
Patients suffered from recent (<21 days), painful, osteoporosis-related VCF. They were randomized to receive daily intravenous infusions of either placebo or 30 mg pamidronate for three consecutive days (total pamidronate: 90 mg). The main criterion for efficacy was improvement in standing pain on a 100-mm visual analogical scale (VAS) at day 7. Secondary criteria were standing pain at days 3 and 30; supine pain at days 3, 7, and 30; patients' overall assessment of improvement; mobility index; and number of "20% responders" and "50% responders" (respectively, 20% and 50% improvement in standing pain at days 7 and 30). Statistical analysis with non-parametric tests was carried out on an intention to treat basis.
Thirty-two patients were enrolled in the study; 16 were given placebo and 16 pamidronate. Thirty-one patients were evaluated at day 7 and 26 patients at day 30. VAS pain decreased significantly in both groups at day 7 (placebo -23 mm, pamidronate -42 mm, p<0.01). The difference in pain scores between groups was -23.25 mm (confidence interval (CI) [-42.3; -4.2], p=0.018) at day 7 and -26 mm at day 30 (p=0.03), in favor of pamidronate. At day 7, there were 4 versus 12 "50% responders," respectively, in the placebo and in the pamidronate groups (likelihood ratio: 8.372; p=0.004) and 9 versus 14 "20% responders" (likelihood ratio: 4.038; p=0.044). At day 30, there were 5 versus 10 "50% responders," respectively, in the placebo and in the pamidronate groups, and 7 versus 11 "20% responders." Patients' overall assessment of improvement at day 7 was 37+/-26 mm in the placebo group and 59+/-30 mm in the pamidronate group (p=0.019), and 42+/-26 mm and 72+/-21 mm at day 30 (p=0.07). The two groups did not differ significantly at days 7 and 30 for supine pain, Schober index, or finger-ground distance. No significant adverse reaction related to treatment occurred.
Pamidronate provides rapid and sustained pain relief in patients with acute painful osteoporotic VCF and is well tolerated. Further investigations are needed to better define the place of pamidronate in the management of painful recent osteoporotic collapse.
我们进行了一项随机、双盲、对照临床试验,比较静脉注射帕米膦酸盐和安慰剂对近期骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(VCF)疼痛缓解的效果。
患者患有近期(<21天)、疼痛性、与骨质疏松相关的VCF。他们被随机分为两组,连续三天每日静脉输注安慰剂或30毫克帕米膦酸盐(帕米膦酸盐总量:90毫克)。疗效的主要标准是第7天100毫米视觉模拟量表(VAS)上站立疼痛的改善情况。次要标准包括第3天和第30天的站立疼痛;第3天、第7天和第30天的仰卧疼痛;患者对改善情况的总体评估;活动指数;以及“20%反应者”和“50%反应者”的数量(分别指第7天和第30天站立疼痛改善20%和50%)。采用非参数检验进行意向性治疗分析。
32名患者纳入研究;16名给予安慰剂,16名给予帕米膦酸盐。第7天对31名患者进行了评估,第30天对26名患者进行了评估。两组在第7天VAS疼痛均显著降低(安慰剂组降低23毫米,帕米膦酸盐组降低42毫米,p<0.01)。第7天两组疼痛评分差异为-23.25毫米(置信区间(CI)[-42.3;-4.2],p=0.018),第30天为-26毫米(p=0.03),帕米膦酸盐组更优。第7天,安慰剂组和帕米膦酸盐组分别有4名和12名“50%反应者”(似然比:8.372;p=0.004),9名和14名“20%反应者”(似然比:4.038;p=0.044)。第30天,安慰剂组和帕米膦酸盐组分别有5名和10名“50%反应者”,7名和11名“20%反应者”。第7天安慰剂组患者对改善情况的总体评估为37±26毫米,帕米膦酸盐组为59±30毫米(p=0.019),第30天分别为42±26毫米和72±21毫米(p=0.07)。两组在第7天和第30天的仰卧疼痛、Schober指数或手指-地面距离方面无显著差异。未发生与治疗相关的显著不良反应。
帕米膦酸盐能为急性疼痛性骨质疏松性VCF患者提供快速且持续的疼痛缓解,耐受性良好。需要进一步研究以更好地确定帕米膦酸盐在近期疼痛性骨质疏松性椎体塌陷治疗中的地位。