Immigration and zooplankton community responses to nutrient enrichment: a mesocosm experiment.

Dispersal can be an important determinant of local diversity and species composition, but evidence for effects of the regional species pool on local zooplankton communities has been mixed. Theory and experiments suggest that immigration will be necessary for maintenance of community diversity and functioning during periods of environmental change; conversely, fluctuating resource levels may increase the likelihood of invasion success. We conducted a factorial-design mesocosm experiment to test the effects of a nutrient pulse and weekly immigration from other lakes on the diversity and composition of a pelagic zooplankton community. Contrary to expectations, there were no interactive effects of nutrient enrichment and immigration on any measure of diversity, and the initial shift in community composition in response to the nutrient pulse did not depend on the introduction of new species or genotypes from more productive lakes. Although immigration increased species richness in enclosures, success of most colonising species was poor. However, the dispersal treatment appears to have enabled a stronger predator response to increased herbivore numbers in nutrient-pulsed enclosures, leading to an eventual decline in the abundance of some herbivorous species in response to immigration. We conclude that community invasibility was not influenced by productivity, and that dispersal limitation did not strongly constrain the response of the zooplankton community to our applied disturbance. This indicates an unexpected resistance to change in species composition and diversity in spite of disturbance, and suggests that, in our study system, changes in the abundance of resident species are more important than introductions of new species in the community response to short-term environmental change.