Kato Yoshiharu, Itoh Tatsuo, Kanaya Koichi, Kubota Motoya, Ito Shunichi
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan.
J Orthop Sci. 2006 Jul;11(4):347-52. doi: 10.1007/s00776-006-1033-x.
A few studies have reported the relation between the atlantoaxial (C1/2) angle and cervical alignment (C2-C7) angle after a Magerl and Brooks (M&B) surgical procedure to treat atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, no study has examined an optimum preoperative C1/2 angle reduction. We aimed to assess the relation between the C1/2 angle reduction and the C2-C7 angle change in patients with progressive RA who underwent the M&B procedure.
We retrospectively analyzed the relation between the preoperative C1/2 angle and C2-C7 angle in 28 consecutive RA patients using their clinical and radiological data. Differences in the preoperative and postoperative C1/2 and C2-C7 angles were detected. Correlations of these angles and the reduced degree of angles were examined. The Ranawat grading scale and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were used to determine myelopathy. Pain was categorized into five categories according to severity. Clinical and X-ray evaluations were collected before surgery, at 3 and/or 6 months after surgery, and at final follow-up.
Clinical symptoms, Ranawat grade, and JOA scores improved postoperatively, and patients achieved bony union within 3 months. We observed a strong and significant correlation between the reduced C1/2 angle and the change in the C2-C7 angle. Patients with a preoperative C1/2 angle of <20 degrees had markedly reduced cervical lordotic angle but this condition was not seen in patients with a preoperative C1/2 angle of >or=20 degrees . The optimum C1/2 angle was estimated as [20 degrees - (preoperative C1/2 angle)] in patients with a C1/2 angle <20 degrees or as an in situ angle in patients with a C1/2 angle of >or=20 degrees .
Surgeons performing the M&B procedure need to select patients carefully and avoid complete or overreduction of the C1/2 angle to prevent serious postoperative SAS and myelopathy.
一些研究报告了在采用马格尔(Magerl)和布鲁克斯(Brooks)(M&B)手术治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的寰枢椎半脱位(AAS)后,寰枢椎(C1/2)角与颈椎排列(C2 - C7)角之间的关系。然而,尚无研究探讨术前C1/2角的最佳减小程度。我们旨在评估接受M&B手术的进展性RA患者中C1/2角减小与C2 - C7角变化之间的关系。
我们回顾性分析了28例连续RA患者的术前C1/2角与C2 - C7角之间的关系,使用了他们的临床和放射学数据。检测术前和术后C1/2及C2 - C7角的差异。检查这些角度及其减小程度的相关性。采用拉纳瓦特(Ranawat)分级量表和日本骨科协会(JOA)评分来确定脊髓病。根据疼痛严重程度将疼痛分为五类。在手术前、手术后3个月和/或6个月以及最终随访时收集临床和X线评估结果。
术后临床症状、拉纳瓦特分级和JOA评分均有改善,患者在3个月内实现了骨愈合。我们观察到C1/2角减小与C2 - C7角变化之间存在强且显著的相关性。术前C1/2角<20度的患者颈椎前凸角明显减小,但术前C1/2角≥20度的患者未出现这种情况。对于C1/2角<20度的患者,最佳C1/2角估计为[20度 - (术前C1/2角)];对于C1/2角≥20度的患者,最佳C1/2角估计为原位角。
进行M&B手术的外科医生需要仔细选择患者,避免C1/2角完全减小或过度减小,以防止术后严重的脊髓性肌萎缩症(SAS)和脊髓病。