Langhinrichsen-Rohling Jennifer, Arata Catalina, O'Brien Natalie, Bowers David, Klibert Jeffrey
Department of Psychology, University of South Alabama, Mobile 36688-0002, USA.
Violence Vict. 2006 Aug;21(4):425-44.
Distress related to answering personal survey questions about drug use, suicidal behavior, and physical and sexual abuse were examined in multiple convenience samples of adolescents. Samples varied in consent procedures utilized (active vs. passive parental consent), data collection setting (school vs. juvenile justice), developmental level (middle school vs. high school). Participation rates differed across consent procedures (e.g., 93% with passive vs. 62% with active parental consent). Results indicated that small percentages of adolescents in every sample reported frequently feeling upset while completing the survey (range 2.5% to 7.6%). Age, race, gender, and data collection strategy did not emerge as significant predictors of feeling upset. Instead, as hypothesized, adolescents reporting a history of suicidal ideation or attempt, illicit drug use, or experiences of physical or sexual victimization endorsed more frequent feelings of upset while completing the survey than peers without these experiences. Taken together, however, these sensitive event experiences explained only 6.6% of the variance in adolescents' upset ratings. The scientific and ethical implications of these findings are discussed with regard to adolescent participation in survey research about sensitive topics.
在多个青少年便利样本中,研究了回答有关药物使用、自杀行为以及身体和性虐待等个人调查问题所带来的困扰。样本在使用的同意程序(主动家长同意与被动家长同意)、数据收集环境(学校与青少年司法机构)、发育水平(初中与高中)方面存在差异。不同同意程序的参与率有所不同(例如,被动同意的参与率为93%,主动家长同意的参与率为62%)。结果表明,每个样本中只有小部分青少年表示在完成调查时经常感到不安(范围为2.5%至7.6%)。年龄、种族、性别和数据收集策略并未成为感到不安的显著预测因素。相反,正如所假设的那样,报告有自杀意念或企图、非法药物使用或身体或性受害经历的青少年,在完成调查时比没有这些经历的同龄人更频繁地感到不安。然而,总体而言,这些敏感事件经历仅解释了青少年不安评分中6.6%的方差。讨论了这些发现对于青少年参与有关敏感话题的调查研究的科学和伦理意义。