Rogers Shane L, Brown Nicole, Goulding Matthew, Campbell Kathryn, Mills Brennen, Hollett Ross, Cruickshank Travis, Nosaka Kazunori
School of Arts and Humanities (Psychology), Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia.
Association of Independent Schools of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6017, Australia.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 9;15(5):643. doi: 10.3390/bs15050643.
This study presents initial reliability and validity evidence for the Brief Emotional Experience Scale (BEES) as a measure of emotional well-being. Using ordinal confirmatory factor analysis across three cross-sectional samples, Australian university students ( = 1239), the general public ( = 5631), and school students from Australia and the UK ( = 767). A correlated two-factor structure was supported. In the university sample, the BEES demonstrated strong convergent validity with other well-being measures and was linked to the lowest levels of reported distress when completing the survey. Preliminary cut-offs for high emotional distress were developed via comparison with the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10), identifying around 20% of females and 10% of males as highly distressed. The findings of this research indicate the BEES can be utilised as a simple, flexible, and low-burden measure of emotional well-being.
本研究提供了简短情绪体验量表(BEES)作为情绪幸福感测量工具的初步信度和效度证据。通过对三个横断面样本进行有序验证性因素分析,样本包括澳大利亚大学生(n = 1239)、普通公众(n = 5631)以及来自澳大利亚和英国的在校学生(n = 767)。支持了一个相关的双因素结构。在大学样本中,BEES与其他幸福感测量工具显示出很强的收敛效度,并且在完成调查时与报告的最低痛苦水平相关。通过与凯斯勒心理痛苦量表(K10)比较,制定了高情绪痛苦的初步临界值,确定约20%的女性和10%的男性为高度痛苦。本研究结果表明,BEES可作为一种简单、灵活且负担较小的情绪幸福感测量工具。