Vega Edward M, O'Leary K Daniel
Stony Brook University, Psychology Department, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2500, USA.
Violence Vict. 2006 Aug;21(4):519-32.
The Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS) have used different formats intended to maximize the accuracy and disclosure of relationship aggression. The original CTS presented items in a hierarchical order, seeking to establish a "context of legitimation." The CTS2 presented items in an interspersed order to reduce denial response sets. The current study used computer administration of the CTS and sought to determine whether the two presentation formats described above result in differing self-reports of aggression and to explore possible causes of such an effect, such as differences in reaction time. Results indicated that item order did not significantly affect reports of aggression, but increasing participants' reaction times by experimental manipulation of the minimum item display duration resulted in increased self-reports of aggression.
冲突策略量表(CTS)采用了不同的形式,旨在最大限度地提高关系攻击行为的准确性和披露程度。最初的CTS以分层顺序呈现项目,试图建立一种“合法化背景”。CTS2以穿插顺序呈现项目,以减少否认反应集。本研究使用CTS的计算机管理方式,旨在确定上述两种呈现形式是否会导致不同的攻击行为自我报告,并探讨这种效应的可能原因,如反应时间的差异。结果表明,项目顺序对攻击行为报告没有显著影响,但通过实验操纵最小项目显示持续时间来增加参与者的反应时间,会导致攻击行为的自我报告增加。