Hamby Sherry, Sugarman David B, Boney-McCoy Sue
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
Violence Vict. 2006 Aug;21(4):507-18.
Researchers assess partner violence using numerous formats, but whether questionnaire format affects obtained rates has rarely been examined. We compared paper-and-pencil versus computer administrations, and standard Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) categories versus dichotomous (yes/no) response categories, in a 2 x 2 experiment with 160 undergraduate students. Differential validity was also examined for gender. Results provide some support for the use of all formats, although sexual coercion rates showed more measurement variability than reports of psychological aggression, physical assault, or injury. Sexual coercion effects also differed by gender. The standard CTS2 categories resulted in more disclosures than dichotomous categories for some variables. Differences between computer and paper-and-pencil formats were generally minimal. More attention to the effects of questionnaire design on disclosures of violence is urgently needed.
研究人员使用多种形式评估伴侣暴力,但问卷形式是否会影响所得比率却鲜有研究。在一项针对160名本科生的2×2实验中,我们比较了纸笔作答与计算机作答,以及标准修订冲突策略量表(CTS2)类别与二分法(是/否)回答类别。还对性别差异效度进行了检验。结果为所有形式的使用提供了一些支持,尽管性胁迫比率的测量变异性比心理攻击、身体攻击或伤害报告的变异性更大。性胁迫效应也因性别而异。对于某些变量,标准CTS2类别比二分法类别能带来更多的披露。计算机和纸笔形式之间的差异通常很小。迫切需要更多地关注问卷设计对暴力披露的影响。