O'Leary K Daniel, Williams Mathew C
Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
J Fam Psychol. 2006 Dec;20(4):656-62. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.20.4.656.
Psychological and Physical Aggression scales met internal consistency and agreement standards on the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) in a randomly recruited sample of 453 married community couples with children. Moreover, partners agreed on the extent of psychological and physical aggression as much or more than they did on CTS2 Negotiation scale and positive behaviors assessed on the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. On the other hand, the CTS2 Sexual Coercion and Injury scales had much lower internal consistencies as measured by Cronbach's alpha, and agreement was generally very low. Men and women reported less abusive behavior and consequent injury than partners reported about them. Correction factors were provided for prevalence estimates of abusive behavior and injury when only perpetrator reports were available.
在一个随机抽取的、有453对育有子女的已婚社区夫妇样本中,心理攻击量表和身体攻击量表在修订后的冲突策略量表(CTS2)上达到了内部一致性和一致性标准。此外,伴侣们在心理攻击和身体攻击程度上的意见一致性,与他们在CTS2谈判量表和二元调适量表上评估的积极行为的意见一致性相同或更高。另一方面,CTS2性胁迫和伤害量表以克朗巴赫α系数衡量的内部一致性要低得多,并且一致性普遍非常低。男性和女性报告的虐待行为及由此导致的伤害,比伴侣报告的要少。当只有施暴者报告时,提供了虐待行为和伤害流行率估计的校正因子。