Wilhelm Christian, Neubauer Andreas, Brendel Cornelia
Department of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2006 Jul 15;70(4):242-50. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20123.
Recent studies have identified ZAP-70 expression status as an excellent prognostic parameter in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). ZAP-70 expression can be determined by direct antibody staining followed by flow cytometric analysis. However, there are currently several different gating strategies for analysis. We compared those strategies for ZAP-70 expression analysis.
One hundred and one patients with B-CLL were analyzed employing a directly labeled alexa-fluor-488-ZAP-70-antibody. In 27 cases, we additionally measured and analyzed ZAP-70 expression, together with healthy controls as described previously.
Applying either T-/NK-cell isotype or healthy control analysis strategies on patient samples that were processed in parallel revealed discrepant results in 48% (12/25) of all cases. Taken together with the 74 B-CLL patients, who were analyzed with regard to average reference values, disconcordant results were obtained in 58% of the samples. We demonstrate that high variances in ZAP-70 T-/NK-cell staining within B-CLL patients, paired with a close proximity of ZAP-70 B-cell values to the suggested cut-off levels, may lead to interpretation difficulties of ZAP-70 status.
We conclude that different gating strategies for determining flow cytometric ZAP-70 expression status produce highly discordant results. Further standardization is required before ZAP-70 can be used as a reliable prognostic parameter in immunophenotyping of B-CLL.
最近的研究已将ZAP-70表达状态确定为慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)的一个出色的预后参数。ZAP-70表达可通过直接抗体染色随后进行流式细胞术分析来确定。然而,目前有几种不同的分析门控策略。我们比较了这些用于ZAP-70表达分析的策略。
采用直接标记的藻红蛋白-488-ZAP-70抗体对101例B-CLL患者进行分析。在27例患者中,我们还按照先前描述的方法,与健康对照一起测量并分析了ZAP-70表达。
对平行处理的患者样本应用T细胞/NK细胞同型或健康对照分析策略,在所有病例中有48%(12/25)显示出不一致的结果。连同74例针对平均参考值进行分析的B-CLL患者一起,58%的样本得到了不一致的结果。我们证明,B-CLL患者中ZAP-70在T细胞/NK细胞上的染色存在高度差异,同时ZAP-70在B细胞上的值接近建议的临界水平,这可能导致对ZAP-70状态的解读困难。
我们得出结论,用于确定流式细胞术ZAP-70表达状态的不同门控策略会产生高度不一致的结果。在ZAP-70可作为B-CLL免疫表型分析中可靠的预后参数使用之前,还需要进一步标准化。