Allahverdyan A E, Nieuwenhuizen Th M
Yerevan Physics Institute, Alikhanian Brothers St. 2, Yerevan 375036, Armenia.
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2006 Jun;73(6 Pt 2):066119. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.066119. Epub 2006 Jun 14.
The issue of the Gibbs paradox is that when considering mixing of two gases within classical thermodynamics, the entropy of mixing appears to be a discontinuous function of the difference between the gases: it is finite for whatever small difference, but vanishes for identical gases. The resolution offered in the literature, with help of quantum mixing entropy, was later shown to be unsatisfactory precisely where it sought to resolve the paradox. Macroscopic thermodynamics, classical or quantum, is unsuitable for explaining the paradox, since it does not deal explicitly with the difference between the gases. The proper approach employs quantum thermodynamics, which deals with finite quantum systems coupled to a large bath and a macroscopic work source. Within quantum thermodynamics, entropy generally loses its dominant place and the target of the paradox is naturally shifted to a decrease of the maximally available work before and after mixing (mixing ergotropy). In contrast to entropy this is an unambiguous quantity. For almost identical gases the mixing ergotropy continuously goes to zero, thus resolving the paradox. In this approach the concept of "difference between the gases" gets a clear operational meaning related to the possibilities of controlling the involved quantum states. Difficulties which prevent resolutions of the paradox in its entropic formulation do not arise here. The mixing ergotropy has several counterintuitive features. It can increase when less precise operations are allowed. In the quantum situation (in contrast to the classical one) the mixing ergotropy can also increase when decreasing the degree of mixing between the gases or when decreasing their distinguishability. These points go against a direct association of physical irreversibility with lack of information.
吉布斯佯谬的问题在于,在经典热力学中考虑两种气体的混合时,混合熵似乎是气体之间差异的不连续函数:无论差异多么小,混合熵都是有限的,但对于相同的气体,混合熵为零。文献中借助量子混合熵给出的解决方案,后来被证明恰恰在试图解决佯谬的地方并不令人满意。宏观热力学,无论是经典的还是量子的,都不适用于解释这个佯谬,因为它没有明确处理气体之间的差异。恰当的方法是采用量子热力学,它处理与大热源和宏观功源耦合的有限量子系统。在量子热力学中,熵通常失去其主导地位,佯谬的目标自然地转移到混合前后最大可用功的减少(混合能质熵)。与熵不同,这是一个明确的量。对于几乎相同的气体,混合能质熵连续趋近于零,从而解决了佯谬。在这种方法中,“气体之间的差异”这一概念获得了与控制所涉及量子态的可能性相关的明确操作意义。在这里不会出现阻止在其熵形式中解决佯谬的困难。混合能质熵有几个违反直觉的特征。当允许不太精确的操作时,它可能会增加。在量子情形下(与经典情形相反),当降低气体之间的混合程度或降低它们的可区分性时,混合能质熵也可能增加。这些观点与物理不可逆性与信息缺乏的直接关联相悖。