Bose P, Regan F, Paterson-Brown S
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Charlotte's Hospital, London, UK. Email
BJOG. 2006 Aug;113(8):919-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01018.x.
Following the results of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths report, which claims two maternal deaths annually in the UK from postpartum haemorrhage, our aim was to assess the accuracy of 'visual estimation of blood loss' and produce suitable pictorial and written algorithms to aid in the recognition and management of massive obstetric haemorrhage.
Observational study to determine discrepancy between actual blood loss (ABL) and estimated blood loss (EBL).
Teaching hospital.
Hundred and three obstetricians, anaesthetists, midwives, nurses and healthcare assistants.
Clinical scenarios were reproduced in the form of 12 Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) style stations augmented with known volumes of whole blood. Individual staff estimated the blood loss visually and recorded their results. Digital photographs were used to produce a pictorial 'algorithm' suitable for use as a teaching tool in labour ward.
Areas of greatest discrepancy between EBL and ABL.
Significant underestimation of the ABL occurred in 5 of the 12 OSCE stations: 500-ml (50-cm diameter) floor spill, 1000-ml (75-cm diameter) floor spill, 1500-ml (100-cm diameter) floor spill, 350-ml capacity of soaked 45- x 45-cm large swab and the 2-l vaginal postpartum haemorrhage on bed/floor.
Accurate visual estimation of blood loss is known to facilitate timely resuscitation, minimising the risk of disseminated intravascular coagulation and reducing the severity of haemorrhagic shock. Participation in clinical reconstructions may encourage early diagnosis and prompt treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. Written and pictorial guidelines may help all staff working in labour wards.
根据《孕产妇死亡保密调查报告》的结果,该报告称英国每年有两例孕产妇死于产后出血,我们的目标是评估“失血目测估计”的准确性,并制定合适的图片和书面算法,以帮助识别和处理严重产科出血。
观察性研究,以确定实际失血量(ABL)与估计失血量(EBL)之间的差异。
教学医院。
103名产科医生、麻醉师、助产士、护士和医护助理。
以12个客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)形式的场景重现临床情况,并添加已知量的全血。每位工作人员目测估计失血量并记录结果。数码照片被用于制作一幅图片“算法”,适合用作产房的教学工具。
EBL与ABL之间差异最大的区域。
在12个OSCE场景中的5个场景出现了对ABL的显著低估:500毫升(直径50厘米)的地面溢出、1000毫升(直径75厘米)的地面溢出、1500毫升(直径100厘米)的地面溢出、浸湿的45×45厘米大纱布350毫升的容量以及床上/地面上2升的阴道产后出血。
已知准确的失血目测估计有助于及时复苏,将弥散性血管内凝血的风险降至最低,并减轻失血性休克的严重程度。参与临床重建可能会鼓励对产后出血进行早期诊断和及时治疗。书面和图片指南可能会帮助产房的所有工作人员。