Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 26;13(9):e0203806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203806. eCollection 2018.
Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the most common obstetric emergency. A well-established postpartum haemorrhage protocol in the labour ward is crucial for effective treatment. The aim of the study was to investigate if practical obstetric team training improves the patient outcome and clinical management of PPH.
The practical obstetric team training (PROBE) at Linköping University Hospital, Sweden, with approximate 3000 deliveries annually, was studied between the years of 2004-2011. Each team consisted of one or two midwives, one obstetrician or one junior doctor and one nurse assistant. Emergency obstetrics cases were trained in a simulation setting. PROBE was scheduled during work hours at an interval of 1.5 years.
Pre-PROBE women (N = 419 were defined as all women with vaginal birth between the years of 2004-2007 with an estimated blood loss of ≥1000 ml within the first 24 hours of delivery. Post-PROBE women (N = 483) were defined as all women with vaginal birth between the years of 2008-2011 with an estimated blood loss of ≥1000 ml within the first 24 hours of delivery. The two groups were compared regarding blood loss parameters and management variables using retrospective data from medical records.
No difference was observed in estimated blood loss, haemoglobin level, blood transfusions or the incidence of postpartum haemorrhage between the two groups. Post-PROBE women had more often secured venous access (p<0.001), monitoring of vital signs (p<0.001) and received fluid resuscitation (p<0.001) compared to pre-PROBE women. The use of uterine massage was also more common among the post-PROBE women compared with the pre-PROBE women (p<0.001).
PROBE improved clinical management but not patient outcome in women with postpartum haemorrhage in the labour ward. These new findings may have clinical implications since they confirm that training was effective concerning the management of postpartum haemorrhage. However, there is still no clear evidence that simulation training improve patient outcome in women with PPH.
产后出血(PPH)是最常见的产科急症。在产房建立完善的产后出血处理方案对于有效治疗至关重要。本研究旨在探究实用产科团队培训是否能改善 PPH 的患者结局和临床管理。
瑞典林雪平大学医院的实用产科团队培训(PROBE)每年约有 3000 例分娩,研究时间为 2004 年至 2011 年。每个团队由 1 名或 2 名助产士、1 名产科医生或 1 名初级医生和 1 名护士助理组成。紧急产科病例在模拟环境中接受培训。PROBE 安排在工作时间进行,间隔为 1.5 年。
预 PROBE 组(N=419)定义为 2004 年至 2007 年期间所有阴道分娩且产后 24 小时内估计出血量≥1000ml 的产妇。PROBE 后组(N=483)定义为 2008 年至 2011 年期间所有阴道分娩且产后 24 小时内估计出血量≥1000ml 的产妇。使用病历中的回顾性数据,比较两组产妇的出血量参数和管理变量。
两组产妇的估计出血量、血红蛋白水平、输血率或产后出血发生率无差异。PROBE 后组产妇更常建立静脉通路(p<0.001)、监测生命体征(p<0.001)和接受液体复苏(p<0.001)。与预 PROBE 组相比,PROBE 后组产妇也更常使用子宫按摩(p<0.001)。
PROBE 改善了产房产后出血产妇的临床管理,但未改善患者结局。这些新发现可能具有临床意义,因为它们证实了培训在产后出血管理方面是有效的。然而,目前仍没有明确的证据表明模拟培训能改善产后出血患者的结局。