• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正中神经创伤性损伤修复后功能恢复评分评估工具的比较

Comparison of assessment tools to score recovery of function after repair of traumatic lesions of the median nerve.

作者信息

Wong K H, Coert J H, Robinson P H, Meek M F

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2006;40(4):219-24. doi: 10.1080/02844310600652878.

DOI:10.1080/02844310600652878
PMID:16911995
Abstract

In this paper the recovery after repair of the median nerve has been used to compare different assessment tools for evaluation of peripheral nerve function: touch (moving 2-point discrimination (2PD); Semmes-Weinstein (SW) monofilament, motor (Medical Research Council (MRC) scale), combined motor and sensory (Dellon modification of the Moberg pick up test; Moberg Recognition test), and pain (visual analogue scale; pinprick-test). The mean (SD) age of our 28 patients was 28 (12) years. The mean (SD) follow-up period was 5 years, 2 months (2 years, 8 months). On the operated side three patients (11%) had a moving 2PD of less than 4 mm. The results of the moving 2PD were compared with those of the SW monofilaments, but with a poor correlation. The MRC score correlated well with opposition movement of the thumb and muscle wasting (p<0.01). We recommend a number of tests to evaluate (the chronological return of) peripheral nerve function.

摘要

在本文中,通过正中神经修复后的恢复情况,对评估周围神经功能的不同评估工具进行了比较:触觉(移动两点辨别觉(2PD);Semmes-Weinstein(SW)单丝)、运动功能(医学研究委员会(MRC)分级)、运动和感觉联合功能(Dellon改良的Moberg拾物试验;Moberg识别试验)以及疼痛(视觉模拟评分法;针刺试验)。我们的28例患者的平均(标准差)年龄为28(12)岁。平均(标准差)随访时间为5年2个月(2年8个月)。在手术侧,3例患者(11%)的移动两点辨别觉小于4mm。将移动两点辨别觉的结果与SW单丝的结果进行比较,但相关性较差。MRC评分与拇指对掌运动和肌肉萎缩相关性良好(p<0.01)。我们推荐了一些测试来评估周围神经功能(按时间顺序的恢复情况)。

相似文献

1
Comparison of assessment tools to score recovery of function after repair of traumatic lesions of the median nerve.正中神经创伤性损伤修复后功能恢复评分评估工具的比较
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2006;40(4):219-24. doi: 10.1080/02844310600652878.
2
Recovery of touch after median nerve lesion and subsequent repair.正中神经损伤及后续修复后的触觉恢复。
Microsurgery. 2003;23(1):2-5. doi: 10.1002/micr.10087.
3
A study of the relative responsiveness of five sensibility tests for assessment of recovery after median nerve injury and repair.一项关于五种感觉测试对正中神经损伤与修复后恢复情况评估的相对反应性的研究。
J Hand Surg Br. 2003 Jun;28(3):255-60. doi: 10.1016/s0266-7681(03)00017-2.
4
Recovery of sensory and motor function after nerve repair. A rationale for evaluation.神经修复后感觉和运动功能的恢复。评估的基本原理。
J Hand Ther. 1996 Oct-Dec;9(4):315-27. doi: 10.1016/s0894-1130(96)80037-8.
5
Motor and sensory reinnervation in the hand after an end-to-side median to ulnar nerve coaptation in the forearm.前臂正中神经与尺神经端侧吻合术后手部的运动和感觉再支配。
Br J Plast Surg. 1999 Jul;52(5):404-7. doi: 10.1054/bjps.1999.3123.
6
Similar 2-point discrimination and stereognosia but better locognosia at long term with an independent home-based sensory reeducation program vs no reeducation after low-median nerve transection and repair.采用独立的家庭感觉再教育方案与低正中神经切断和修复后不进行再教育相比,长期具有相似的 2 点辨别觉和实体觉,但定位觉更好。
J Hand Ther. 2019 Jul-Sep;32(3):305-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
7
Effect of sensory re-education after low median nerve complete transection and repair.正中神经低位完全横断并修复后感觉再训练的效果。
J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Sep;34(7):1210-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.04.014. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
8
Interpretation of cutaneous pressure threshold (Semmes-Weinstein monofilament measurement) following median nerve repair and sensory reeducation in the adult.成人正中神经修复及感觉再训练后皮肤压力阈值(Semmes-Weinstein单丝测量)的解读
Microsurgery. 1989;10(2):142-4. doi: 10.1002/micr.1920100216.
9
Reverse homodigital dorsoradial flaps for thumb coverage obtained good sensory recovery after a long time follow up.逆行同指背桡侧皮瓣修复拇指创面经长期随访获得了良好的感觉恢复。
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2023 Feb-Dec;57(1-6):172-177. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2021.2024558. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
10
Reappraisal of Clinical Deficits Following High Median Nerve Injuries.高位正中神经损伤后临床功能缺损的重新评估
J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Jan;41(1):13-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.10.022.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship Between Sensibility Tests and Functional Outcomes in Patients With Traumatic Upper Limb Nerve Injuries: A Systematic Review.创伤性上肢神经损伤患者感觉测试与功能结局的关系:一项系统评价
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2021 Sep 20;3(4):100159. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100159. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Long-term sensibility outcomes of secondary digital nerve reconstruction with sural nerve autografts: a retrospective study.腓肠神经自体移植重建指固有神经后远期感觉功能的临床研究
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Jun;48(3):2341-2347. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01747-4. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
3
Comparison of short- with long-term regeneration results after digital nerve reconstruction with muscle-in-vein conduits.
采用静脉内置肌导管进行指神经重建后短期与长期再生结果的比较。
Neural Regen Res. 2015 Oct;10(10):1674-7. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.165321.
4
Use of vein conduit and isolated nerve graft in peripheral nerve repair: a comparative study.静脉导管与游离神经移植在周围神经修复中的应用:一项对比研究。
Plast Surg Int. 2014;2014:587968. doi: 10.1155/2014/587968. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
5
Identification of three movement phases of the hand during lateral and pulp pinches using video motion capture.使用视频动作捕捉技术识别在侧捏和指尖捏过程中手部的三个运动阶段。
Hand (N Y). 2013 Jun;8(2):123-31. doi: 10.1007/s11552-013-9517-6.
6
Neuropathic pain in patients with upper-extremity nerve injury.上肢神经损伤患者的神经性疼痛。
Physiother Can. 2010 Summer;62(3):190-201. doi: 10.3138/physio.62.3.190. Epub 2010 Jul 23.