Suppr超能文献

医生对青少年联合破伤风、白喉和无细胞百日咳疫苗的态度及偏好。

Physician attitudes and preferences about combined Tdap vaccines for adolescents.

作者信息

Davis Mathew M, Broder Karen R, Cowan Anne E, Mijalski Christina, Katrina Kretsinger, Stokley Shannon, Clark Sarah J

机构信息

Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit, Division of General Pediatrics, General R. Ford School of Public Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0456, USA.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2006 Aug;31(2):176-80. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.03.023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Combined tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) boosters for adolescents are a new strategy to prevent pertussis. We examined the current practices of pediatricians and family physicians regarding adolescent tetanus and diphtheria toxoids (Td) vaccine immunizations and providers' potential adherence to new Tdap recommendations for adolescents.

METHODS

Using a brief survey instrument sent to a random sample of pediatricians and family physicians in January 2005, we assessed providers' patterns of administration of Td boosters, barriers to Td boosters, and agreement that pertussis vaccination of adolescents is warranted. Results of analyses in February 2005 were presented to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to inform its deliberations regarding adolescent Tdap vaccination.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 56% (57% pediatricians, 55% family physicians). Among 297 respondents (154 pediatricians, 143 family physicians) eligible for analysis because they provide care to adolescents, pediatricians (77%) were significantly more likely than family physicians (51%, p < 0.0001) to report that they routinely administer Td at preventive care visits for adolescents aged 11 to 12 years, but otherwise the specialties were similar in their Td practices. Forty-four percent of respondents cited infrequency of adolescent visits as a barrier to Td immunization. Slightly more than half the sample (57%) agreed or strongly agreed that pertussis is serious enough to warrant replacing Td with Tdap for adolescents; pediatricians (70%) were significantly more likely than family physicians (42%, p < 0.0001) to endorse this statement.

CONCLUSIONS

This national survey indicates moderate willingness, stronger among pediatricians than among family physicians, to support recommendations for Tdap among adolescents. In February 2006, CDC released recommendations that adolescents aged 11 to 18 (preferred age 11 to 12) receive a single dose of Tdap in place of Td if they have not already received the latter. Near-term efforts regarding Tdap recommendations must address providers' concerns about infrequent routine visits for adolescents and convince more physicians of the importance of pertussis booster immunization during adolescence.

摘要

背景

青少年联合破伤风类毒素、白喉类毒素减少量及无细胞百日咳疫苗(Tdap)加强免疫是预防百日咳的一项新策略。我们调查了儿科医生和家庭医生在青少年破伤风和白喉类毒素(Td)疫苗免疫方面的当前做法,以及医疗服务提供者对青少年Tdap新建议的潜在依从性。

方法

2005年1月,我们向儿科医生和家庭医生的随机样本发送了一份简短调查问卷,评估医疗服务提供者的Td加强免疫接种模式、Td加强免疫的障碍,以及对青少年进行百日咳疫苗接种必要性的认同度。2005年2月的分析结果提交给了疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)免疫实践咨询委员会,以为其关于青少年Tdap疫苗接种的审议提供参考。

结果

总体回复率为56%(儿科医生为57%,家庭医生为55%)。在因为青少年提供医疗服务而符合分析条件的297名受访者(154名儿科医生,143名家庭医生)中,儿科医生(77%)比家庭医生(51%,p<0.0001)更有可能报告他们在为11至12岁青少年进行预防性保健就诊时常规接种Td,但除此之外,这两个专业在Td接种实践方面相似。44%的受访者将青少年就诊不频繁列为Td免疫接种的障碍。略超过一半的样本(57%)同意或强烈同意百日咳严重到足以用Tdap替代青少年的Td;儿科医生(70%)比家庭医生(42%,p<0.0001)更有可能支持这一说法。

结论

这项全国性调查表明,在支持青少年Tdap建议方面,意愿适中,儿科医生的意愿强于家庭医生。2006年2月,CDC发布建议,11至18岁(首选年龄11至12岁)的青少年若尚未接种Td,应接种一剂Tdap以替代Td。关于Tdap建议的近期工作必须解决医疗服务提供者对青少年常规就诊不频繁的担忧,并让更多医生相信青少年期进行百日咳加强免疫的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验