Suppr超能文献

与对照组相比,静脉注射西苯唑啉对持续性室性心动过速患者心室易损性和电生理的影响。

Effects of intravenous cibenzoline on ventricular vulnerability and electrophysiology in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia in comparison to a control group.

作者信息

Kühlkamp V, Schmid F, Mayer F, Ickrath O, Haasis R, Seipel L

机构信息

Medizinische Klinik Abteilung III, Eberhard-Karls-Universität, Tübingen, F.R.G.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990 Mar;15(3):472-5. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199003000-00018.

Abstract

The electrophysiologic effects of intravenous (i.v. 1.5 mg/kg) cibenzoline were investigated in 13 patients with organic heart disease and supraventricular arrhythmias (control group) and 13 patients with drug refractory sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT group). In both groups, cibenzoline increased the effective refractory period (ERP) of the right ventricle (p less than or equal to 0.05), QRS duration (p less than or equal to 0.01), and QTc duration (p less than or equal to 0.01). Cycle length of the VT was increased from 311 +/- 73 to 393 +/- 119 ms (p less than or equal to 0.05) as well. The increase in QTc duration was more pronounced (p less than or equal to 0.05) in the VT group as compared with the control group. In four patients in the VT group with the largest increase in QRS-, QTc duration and cycle length of the VT proarrhythmia was noted after i.v. cibenzoline. Cibenzoline plasma levels were not significantly different between the two study groups. In the VT group, induction of VT was prevented in 2 patients, more difficult in 2 patients, easier in 1 patient, and unchanged in 5 patients. Spontaneous occurrence of the VT or induction by atrial stimulation was noted in 4 patients. In the control group, ventricular vulnerability remained unchanged. Cibenzoline may be effective in selected patients with drug refractory VT. In such patients, the increase in QTc duration was more pronounced as compared with a control group.

摘要

对13例患有器质性心脏病和室上性心律失常的患者(对照组)以及13例药物难治性持续性室性心动过速患者(室性心动过速组)研究了静脉注射(1.5毫克/千克)西苯唑啉的电生理效应。在两组中,西苯唑啉均增加了右心室的有效不应期(ERP)(p≤0.05)、QRS时限(p≤0.01)和QTc时限(p≤0.01)。室性心动过速的周期长度也从311±73增加到393±119毫秒(p≤0.05)。与对照组相比,室性心动过速组QTc时限的增加更为明显(p≤0.05)。在室性心动过速组中,有4例患者静脉注射西苯唑啉后出现了室性心动过速的QRS、QTc时限和周期长度增加最为明显的情况。两个研究组之间的西苯唑啉血浆水平无显著差异。在室性心动过速组中,2例患者的室性心动过速诱发被预防,2例患者诱发更困难,1例患者诱发更容易,5例患者无变化。4例患者出现了室性心动过速的自发发作或心房刺激诱发。在对照组中,心室易损性保持不变。西苯唑啉可能对某些药物难治性室性心动过速患者有效。在此类患者中,与对照组相比,QTc时限的增加更为明显。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验