Carragee Eugene J, Lincoln Todd, Parmar Vik Singh, Alamin Todd
Orthopaedic Surgery Division, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Aug 15;31(18):2115-23. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000231436.30262.dd.
This is a prospective study of the validity of a positive test result in provocative lumbar discography for the diagnosis of "discogenic pain."
To investigate the hypothesis that provocative discography by strict criteria accurately identifies a low back pain illness due to a primary disc lesion.
According to the Sackett and Haynes criteria for establishing diagnostic test validity, no test without a gold standard external standard can be meaningfully applied. Provocative discography as a test for determining "discogenic pain" has, to date, not been compared against a gold standard. Absent a gold standard reference, there can be no validity assessment or systematic improvement of test accuracy. This is the first study to apply an external gold standard evaluation of the diagnostic validity of discography in any manner.
Over a 5-year period using a strict enrollment protocol, 32 patients with low back pain and a positive single-level low-pressure provocative discogram, underwent spinal fusion. Subjects with known patient selection comorbidities were excluded. Generic surgical limitations/morbidity were controlled by comparison to the clinical outcomes of a strictly-matched cohort of 34 patients having a well-accepted single-level lumbar pathology (unstable spondylolisthesis). Treatment success was compared between groups.
In the control-spondylolisthesis group, 23 of 32 patients (72%) met the highly effective success criteria compared with 8 of 30 in the presumed discogenic pain cohort (27%). The proportion of patients who met the "minimal acceptable outcome" was 29 of 32 (91%) in the spondylolisthesis group and 13 of 30 (43%) in the presumed discogenic pain group. Adjusting for surgical morbidity and dropout failure, by either criteria of success, the best-case positive predictive value of discography was calculated to be 50% to 60%.
Positive discography was not highly predictive in identifying bona fide isolated intradiscal lesions primarily causing chronic serious LBP illness in this first study comparing discography results to a gold standard.
这是一项关于激发性腰椎间盘造影术阳性检测结果对“椎间盘源性疼痛”诊断有效性的前瞻性研究。
探讨严格标准下的激发性椎间盘造影术能准确识别由原发性椎间盘病变引起的下腰痛疾病这一假设。
根据Sackett和Haynes建立诊断测试有效性的标准,没有金标准外部标准的测试无法有意义地应用。激发性椎间盘造影术作为确定“椎间盘源性疼痛”的测试,迄今为止尚未与金标准进行比较。没有金标准参考,就无法进行有效性评估或系统地提高测试准确性。这是第一项以任何方式对椎间盘造影术诊断有效性进行外部金标准评估的研究。
在5年期间,采用严格的纳入方案,对32例下腰痛且单节段低压激发性椎间盘造影阳性的患者进行了脊柱融合术。排除有已知患者选择合并症的受试者。通过与34例患有公认的单节段腰椎病变(不稳定腰椎滑脱)的严格匹配队列的临床结果进行比较,控制一般手术限制/发病率。比较两组的治疗成功率。
在腰椎滑脱对照组中,32例患者中有23例(72%)达到高效成功标准,而在假定的椎间盘源性疼痛队列中,30例患者中有8例(27%)达到该标准。达到“最低可接受结果”的患者比例在腰椎滑脱组中为32例中的29例(91%),在假定的椎间盘源性疼痛组中为30例中的13例(43%)。根据手术发病率和失访失败情况进行调整,无论采用何种成功标准,椎间盘造影术的最佳阳性预测值计算为50%至60%。
在第一项将椎间盘造影结果与金标准进行比较的研究中,阳性椎间盘造影术在识别主要导致慢性严重下腰痛疾病的真正孤立性椎间盘内病变方面预测性不高。