Nguyen Minhtri K, Kurtz Ira
Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 10833 Le Conte Ave., Rm. 7-155 Factor Bldg., Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Jan;102(1):445-7. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00614.2006. Epub 2006 Aug 17.
Recently, there is renewed interest in the role of osmotically inactive Na(+) storage during Na(+) retention. Although it is well accepted that a portion of the total exchangeable Na(+) reservoir is osmotically inactive, there is current controversy as to whether the osmotically inactive Na(+) storage pool is fixed or variable during Na(+) retention. In this article, we analyze the current scientific evidence to assess whether the osmotically inactive Na(+) storage pool can be dynamically regulated. Our analysis supports the assertion that the osmotically inactive Na(+) storage pool is fixed rather than variable.
最近,人们对钠潴留期间渗透惰性钠(Na⁺)储存的作用重新产生了兴趣。尽管人们普遍认为,总可交换钠(Na⁺)库的一部分是渗透惰性的,但关于在钠潴留期间渗透惰性钠(Na⁺)储存池是固定的还是可变的,目前存在争议。在本文中,我们分析了当前的科学证据,以评估渗透惰性钠(Na⁺)储存池是否可以动态调节。我们的分析支持这样一种观点,即渗透惰性钠(Na⁺)储存池是固定的而非可变的。