• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

渗透惰性钠和钾的储存:从埃德尔曼和博林的数据中获得的经验教训。

Osmotically inactive sodium and potassium storage: lessons learned from the Edelman and Boling data.

作者信息

Nguyen Minhtri K, Nguyen Dai-Scott, Nguyen Minh-Kevin

机构信息

David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California

David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2016 Sep 1;311(3):F539-47. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00215.2016. Epub 2016 Jun 8.

DOI:10.1152/ajprenal.00215.2016
PMID:27279486
Abstract

Because changes in the plasma water sodium concentration ([Na(+)]pw) are clinically due to changes in the mass balance of Na(+), K(+), and H2O, the analysis and treatment of the dysnatremias are dependent on the validity of the Edelman equation in defining the quantitative interrelationship between the [Na(+)]pw and the total exchangeable sodium (Nae), total exchangeable potassium (Ke), and total body water (TBW) (Edelman IS, Leibman J, O'Meara MP, Birkenfeld LW. J Clin Invest 37: 1236-1256, 1958): [Na(+)]pw = 1.11(Nae + Ke)/TBW - 25.6. The interrelationship between [Na(+)]pw and Nae, Ke, and TBW in the Edelman equation is empirically determined by accounting for measurement errors in all of these variables. In contrast, linear regression analysis of the same data set using [Na(+)]pw as the dependent variable yields the following equation: [Na(+)]pw = 0.93(Nae + Ke)/TBW + 1.37. Moreover, based on the study by Boling et al. (Boling EA, Lipkind JB. 18: 943-949, 1963), the [Na(+)]pw is related to the Nae, Ke, and TBW by the following linear regression equation: [Na(+)]pw = 0.487(Nae + Ke)/TBW + 71.54. The disparities between the slope and y-intercept of these three equations are unknown. In this mathematical analysis, we demonstrate that the disparities between the slope and y-intercept in these three equations can be explained by how the osmotically inactive Na(+) and K(+) storage pool is quantitatively accounted for. Our analysis also indicates that the osmotically inactive Na(+) and K(+) storage pool is dynamically regulated and that changes in the [Na(+)]pw can be predicted based on changes in the Nae, Ke, and TBW despite dynamic changes in the osmotically inactive Na(+) and K(+) storage pool.

摘要

由于临床上血浆水钠浓度([Na⁺]pw)的变化是由Na⁺、K⁺和H₂O的质量平衡变化引起的,因此,对钠代谢紊乱的分析和治疗取决于埃德尔曼方程在定义[Na⁺]pw与可交换钠总量(Nae)、可交换钾总量(Ke)和总体水(TBW)之间定量相互关系方面的有效性(埃德尔曼IS、莱布曼J、奥米拉MP、伯肯菲尔德LW。《临床研究杂志》37: 1236 - 1256,1958年):[Na⁺]pw = 1.11(Nae + Ke)/TBW - 25.6。埃德尔曼方程中[Na⁺]pw与Nae、Ke和TBW之间的相互关系是通过考虑所有这些变量的测量误差凭经验确定的。相比之下,以[Na⁺]pw作为因变量对同一数据集进行线性回归分析得出以下方程:[Na⁺]pw = 0.93(Nae + Ke)/TBW + 1.37。此外,根据博林等人的研究(博林EA、利普金德JB。18: 943 - 949,1963年),[Na⁺]pw与Nae、Ke和TBW之间的线性回归方程如下:[Na⁺]pw = 0.487(Nae + Ke)/TBW + 71.54。这三个方程的斜率和y轴截距之间的差异尚不清楚。在本数学分析中,我们证明这三个方程的斜率和y轴截距之间的差异可以通过对渗透惰性Na⁺和K⁺储存池的定量计算方式来解释。我们的分析还表明,渗透惰性Na⁺和K⁺储存池是动态调节的,尽管渗透惰性Na⁺和K⁺储存池存在动态变化,但仍可根据Nae、Ke和TBW的变化来预测[Na⁺]pw的变化。

相似文献

1
Osmotically inactive sodium and potassium storage: lessons learned from the Edelman and Boling data.渗透惰性钠和钾的储存:从埃德尔曼和博林的数据中获得的经验教训。
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2016 Sep 1;311(3):F539-47. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00215.2016. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
2
New insights into the pathophysiology of the dysnatremias: a quantitative analysis.低钠血症病理生理学的新见解:定量分析
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2004 Aug;287(2):F172-80. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00106.2004.
3
Role of potassium in hypokalemia-induced hyponatremia: lessons learned from the Edelman equation.钾在低钾血症所致低钠血症中的作用:从埃德尔曼方程中获得的经验教训。
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2004 Jun;8(2):98-102. doi: 10.1007/s10157-004-0281-3.
4
Determinants of plasma water sodium concentration as reflected in the Edelman equation: role of osmotic and Gibbs-Donnan equilibrium.埃德尔曼方程所反映的血浆水钠浓度的决定因素:渗透和吉布斯-唐南平衡的作用
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2004 May;286(5):F828-37. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00393.2003. Epub 2004 Jan 20.
5
A new formula for predicting alterations in plasma sodium concentration in peritoneal dialysis.一种预测腹膜透析中血浆钠浓度变化的新公式。
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2005 Jun;288(6):F1113-7. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00387.2004. Epub 2004 Dec 29.
6
Derivation of a new formula for calculating urinary electrolyte-free water clearance based on the Edelman equation.基于埃德尔曼方程推导一种计算尿无电解质水清除率的新公式。
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2005 Jan;288(1):F1-7. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00259.2004. Epub 2004 Sep 21.
7
Evolving concepts in the quantitative analysis of the determinants of the plasma water sodium concentration and the pathophysiology and treatment of the dysnatremias.血浆水钠浓度决定因素的定量分析以及钠代谢紊乱的病理生理学与治疗方面不断发展的概念。
Kidney Int. 2005 Nov;68(5):1982-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00652.x.
8
Quantitative approaches to the analysis and treatment of the dysnatremias.低钠血症分析与治疗的定量方法。
Semin Nephrol. 2009 May;29(3):216-26. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2009.03.006.
9
Whole-body electrolyte-free water clearance: derivation and clinical utility in analyzing the pathogenesis of the dysnatremias.全身无电解质水清除率:在分析钠代谢紊乱发病机制中的推导及临床应用
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2006 Mar;10(1):19-24. doi: 10.1007/s10157-005-0395-2.
10
Can Changes in the Plasma Sodium Concentration Be Predicted Based on the Mass Balance of Sodium, Potassium, and Water in the Face of Osmotically Inactive Sodium Storage?在面对无渗透活性钠储存时,基于钠、钾和水的质量平衡,能否预测血浆钠浓度的变化?
Nephron. 2021;145(4):388-391. doi: 10.1159/000515726. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Classifying Hypotonic Hyponatremia by Projected Treatment Effects - A Quantitative 3-Dimensional Framework.通过预期治疗效果对低渗性低钠血症进行分类——一个定量三维框架
Kidney Int Rep. 2023 Sep 9;8(12):2720-2732. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.09.002. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Edelman Revisited: Concepts, Achievements, and Challenges.再探埃德尔曼:概念、成就与挑战
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 10;8:808765. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.808765. eCollection 2021.