Franks Peter, Meldrum Sean, Fiscella Kevin
Department of Family & Community Medicine, Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, University of California at Davis, Sacramento, California 95817, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Sep;21(9):955-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00505.x.
Prior literature suggests that blacks are more likely to be discharged against medical advice (DAMA).
We examined whether DAMA from general hospitals varies by race/ethnicity and whether this variation is explained by individual and hospital factors. DESIGN, SUBJECTS, AND MEASUREMENTS: We conducted cross-sectional analyses of 1998 to 2000 hospital discharge data, linked to the American Hospital Association data, on adults admitted for acute general hospital care in California, Florida, and New York. A series of hierarchical logistic regression analyses explored factors associated with DAMA, initially adjusting for age and gender, then sequentially adding adjustment for comorbidities, individual socio-economic factors, and finally hospital characteristics.
Compared with whites, blacks had a 2-fold higher age-gender adjusted odds of DAMA, a risk that progressively diminished with increasing adjustment (final adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.91, 1.00). While Hispanics had an increased risk of DAMA in age-gender-adjusted analyses, the final model revealed a protective effect (adjusted OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.62, 0.70), similar to that observed for Asians.
Disparities in DAMA affecting minority patients in general hospitals are largely accounted for by individual and hospital socio-economic factors. The absence of any adjusted disparity affecting blacks, and the protective effect observed for Hispanics and other minorities suggest that individual discrimination and poor communication are not primary determinants of DAMA, but where patients are admitted does contribute to disparities in DAMA.
先前的文献表明,黑人更有可能违反医嘱出院(DAMA)。
我们研究了综合医院中违反医嘱出院的情况是否因种族/民族而异,以及这种差异是否可以由个体和医院因素来解释。设计、研究对象与测量方法:我们对1998年至2000年的医院出院数据进行了横断面分析,这些数据与美国医院协会的数据相关联,涉及加利福尼亚州、佛罗里达州和纽约州因急性综合医院护理而住院的成年人。一系列分层逻辑回归分析探讨了与违反医嘱出院相关的因素,最初对年龄和性别进行了调整,然后依次增加了对合并症、个体社会经济因素的调整,最后是医院特征。
与白人相比,黑人在年龄和性别调整后的违反医嘱出院几率高出两倍,随着调整的增加,这种风险逐渐降低(最终调整后的优势比[OR]=0.95,95%置信区间[CI]=0.91,1.00)。虽然西班牙裔在年龄和性别调整分析中违反医嘱出院的风险增加,但最终模型显示出保护作用(调整后的OR=0.66,95%CI=0.62,0.70),与亚洲人观察到的情况类似。
综合医院中影响少数族裔患者的违反医嘱出院差异在很大程度上由个体和医院的社会经济因素造成。没有发现影响黑人的任何调整后差异,以及对西班牙裔和其他少数族裔观察到的保护作用表明个体歧视和沟通不畅不是违反医嘱出院的主要决定因素,但患者的住院地点确实导致了违反医嘱出院的差异。