Kelly Adrian B, Lapworth Kely
School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Michie Building, St Lucia 4072, Australia.
Prev Med. 2006 Dec;43(6):466-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.06.018. Epub 2006 Aug 21.
To evaluate the efficacy of a short-term tobacco-focused intervention for high school students referred by school administrators because of tobacco use.
A sample of 56 adolescents (66% male, mean age 15 years) was recruited through referrals from three state high schools. Participants were randomly assigned to a one-hour motivational interview (MI) session or to standard care (advice/education). The two groups were followed up at one, three, and six-month intervals.
The MI intervention resulted in significant short-term reductions in quantity and frequency of smoking relative to standard care, however, effects were not maintained at 3- and 6-month follow-up. Improvements in refusal self-efficacy were significant relative to standard care.
For adolescents who are established smokers and at high risk of other problems, motivational interviewing was associated with modest short-term gains relative to standard care.
评估针对因吸烟被学校管理人员转介的高中生进行的短期以烟草为重点的干预措施的效果。
通过来自三所州立高中的转介招募了56名青少年(66%为男性,平均年龄15岁)。参与者被随机分配到一个小时的动机性访谈(MI)环节或标准护理(建议/教育)。两组在1个月、3个月和6个月的间隔进行随访。
与标准护理相比,MI干预导致吸烟量和频率在短期内显著减少,然而,在3个月和6个月的随访中效果未得到维持。与标准护理相比,拒绝自我效能的改善显著。
对于已吸烟且有其他问题高风险的青少年,相对于标准护理,动机性访谈带来了适度的短期收益。