Weise David, Schramm Axel, Stefan Katja, Wolters Alexander, Reiners Karlheinz, Naumann Markus, Classen Joseph
Human Cortical Physiology and Motor Control Laboratory, Department of Neurology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Brain. 2006 Oct;129(Pt 10):2709-21. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl221. Epub 2006 Aug 18.
Neuronal plasticity is to be kept within operational limits to serve its purpose as a safe memory system that shapes and focuses sensory and motor representations. Temporal and spatial properties of motor cortical plasticity were assessed in patients with writer's cramp using a model of long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) of synaptic efficacy. Paired associative stimulation (PAS) combined repetitive electric stimulation of the median or ulnar nerve (MN or UN) with subsequent transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralateral dominant motor cortex at 21.5 ms (MN-PAS21.5; UN-PAS21.5) or 10 ms (MN-PAS10). Motor-evoked potentials were recorded from abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles in 10 patients with writer's cramp and 10 matched healthy control subjects. Following MN-PAS21.5 or UN-PAS21.5 in non-dystonic subjects, motor responses increased if the afferent PAS-component came from a homologous peripheral region and remained stable with a non-homologous input. In contrast, following either MN-PAS21.5 or UN-PAS21.5, both APB- and ADM-amplitudes increased in patients. Compared with controls, this increase started earlier, its magnitude was larger and its duration longer. Following MN-PAS10 in controls, APB-amplitudes decreased, while ADM-amplitudes increased. In writer's cramp, the decrease of APB-amplitudes started earlier and lasted longer. Of note, ADM-amplitudes were decreased, too. LTP-like as well as LTD-like plasticity is abnormal with respect to both gain and spatial organization. These findings may help to develop a pathophysiological model explaining core features of focal dystonia.
神经元可塑性需保持在一定的功能范围内,以作为一个塑造并聚焦感觉和运动表征的安全记忆系统发挥其作用。我们使用突触效能的长时程增强(LTP)和长时程抑制(LTD)模型,评估了书写痉挛患者运动皮质可塑性的时间和空间特性。配对联想刺激(PAS)将正中神经或尺神经(MN或UN)的重复电刺激与随后在21.5毫秒(MN-PAS21.5;UN-PAS21.5)或10毫秒(MN-PAS10)时对侧优势运动皮质的经颅磁刺激相结合。在10例书写痉挛患者和10名匹配的健康对照受试者中,从拇短展肌(APB)和小指展肌(ADM)记录运动诱发电位。在非肌张力障碍受试者中,MN-PAS21.5或UN-PAS21.5后,如果传入PAS成分来自同源外周区域,运动反应增强;如果输入为非同源,则运动反应保持稳定。相比之下,在书写痉挛患者中,MN-PAS21.5或UN-PAS21.5后,APB和ADM的波幅均增加。与对照组相比,这种增加开始得更早,幅度更大,持续时间更长。在对照组中,MN-PAS10后,APB波幅降低,而ADM波幅增加。在书写痉挛患者中,APB波幅的降低开始得更早,持续时间更长。值得注意的是,ADM波幅也降低了。LTP样和LTD样可塑性在增益和空间组织方面均异常。这些发现可能有助于建立一个解释局灶性肌张力障碍核心特征的病理生理模型。