Hodzic Kenan, Thordstein Magnus, Strandberg Joakim, Jerlhag Elisabet, Wass Caroline E
Division of Pharmacology, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Biomedicine and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
Brain Sci. 2025 Apr 27;15(5):461. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15050461.
: Plasticity deficits play a key role in the pathophysiology of various psychiatric and neurological disorders. Paired associative stimulation (PAS) leverages Hebbian principles to induce synaptic plasticity in the human brain. By repeatedly pairing (1) the peripheral nerve stimulation of the median nerve with (2) transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex (M1) at different inter-stimulus intervals (25 ms; PAS-25, or 10 ms; PAS-10), corticospinal excitability can be increased (PAS-25, mimicking long-term potentiation (LTP)) or decreased (PAS-10, mimicking long-term depression (LTD)). However, variations in the number of pairings and inter-pair intervals lack consensus. The aim of the study was to evaluate four different PAS paradigms, i.e., PAS-10 and PAS-25 with both 180 versus 225 pairings each, to establish the most reliable PAS protocols for LTP- and LTD-like cortical changes. : In a randomized, double-blind, crossover study, 14 healthy participants underwent PAS-10 and PAS-25 with 180 and 225 pairings. Excitability was assessed by quantifying the EMG response amplitude of a hand muscle to a single stimulus. : PAS-25 with 225 pairings produced a robust enhancement of corticospinal excitability, while PAS-25 with 180 pairings was less effective. Surprisingly, PAS-10 with both 180 and 225 pairings also increased excitability. : While all four PAS paradigms enhanced M1 excitability, PAS-25 with 225 pairings induced the strongest group-level effects and was most time-efficient. Significant individual variability of PAS responses suggests that optimizing PAS parameters, including pairing number and interstimulus intervals, may be necessary for personalized approaches.
可塑性缺陷在多种精神和神经疾病的病理生理学中起关键作用。配对联想刺激(PAS)利用赫布原理在人脑中诱导突触可塑性。通过在不同的刺激间隔(25毫秒;PAS - 25,或10毫秒;PAS - 10)下,将(1)正中神经的外周神经刺激与(2)初级运动皮层(M1)上的经颅磁刺激反复配对,皮质脊髓兴奋性可增强(PAS - 25,模拟长时程增强(LTP))或降低(PAS - 10,模拟长时程抑制(LTD))。然而,配对次数和配对间隔的变化缺乏共识。本研究的目的是评估四种不同的PAS范式,即PAS - 10和PAS - 25,每种范式分别有180次和225次配对,以建立用于类似LTP和LTD皮质变化的最可靠的PAS方案。
在一项随机、双盲、交叉研究中,14名健康参与者接受了180次和225次配对的PAS - 10和PAS - 25。通过量化手部肌肉对单个刺激的肌电图反应幅度来评估兴奋性。
225次配对的PAS - 25产生了强大的皮质脊髓兴奋性增强,而180次配对的PAS - 25效果较差。令人惊讶的是,180次和225次配对的PAS - 10也增加了兴奋性。
虽然所有四种PAS范式都增强了M1兴奋性,但225次配对的PAS - 25诱导了最强的组水平效应且最省时。PAS反应存在显著的个体差异,这表明优化PAS参数,包括配对次数和刺激间隔,可能是个性化方法所必需的。