MacDougall Andrew S, Turkington Roy
Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Ecology. 2006 Jul;87(7):1831-43. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1831:dcaspo]2.0.co;2.
Diversity is a balance between processes that add and limit species (e.g., dispersal vs. competition), but reconciling their contributions remains a challenge. Recruit-ment-based models predict that dispersal barriers are most limiting for diversity, while competition-based models predict that dispersal matters only when competition is minimized. Testing these models is difficult because their influence varies with scale and site productivity. In a degraded oak savanna, we used plot-level (seed additions, burning) and site-level (proportions of regional functional groups found locally) analyses in areas with variable soil depth to examine how dispersal and competition influence diversity. At the plot level, added species persisted where they were formerly absent, but few established naturally despite fire-induced resource enrichment and nearby populations, revealing the importance of dispersal limitation for diversity. This result did not vary with soil depth or standing crop. Although competition could not prevent establishment in unburned plots, it significantly lowered survival, indicating that resource limitations exacerbate dispersal inefficiencies. At the site level, the concordance between regional and local diversity for native species was associated with soil depth heterogeneity, not dispersal or competition. This suggests that persistence is determined primarily by the influence of the environment on population demographics. Given that the formation of new populations is unlikely, those remaining appear to be confined to optimal habitat where they resist competitive or stochastic displacement, possibly explaining why species loss is rare despite substantial habitat loss and invasion. For exotics, there was no relationship between diversity and soil depth heterogeneity. Annuals with presumed dispersal capabilities were significantly overrepresented in all sites while perennial forbs, the largest regional functional group, were significantly underrepresented. We interpret the native-exotic discrepancies as reflecting the recent arrival of exotics (150 years ago), suggesting that local establishment occurs slowly even for species with regional prevalence. The accumulation lag may be explained by the need for founder populations to be demographically stable; otherwise persistence requires continual immigration favoring overrepresentation by dispersers. Our findings support the view that dispersal limitation restricts diversity within plant communities, but suggests that the impacts of environment on demographic performance ultimately determine the pattern and rate of community assembly.
多样性是增加和限制物种的过程之间的一种平衡(例如,扩散与竞争),但协调它们的作用仍然是一项挑战。基于招募的模型预测,扩散障碍对多样性的限制最大,而基于竞争的模型预测,只有在竞争最小化时扩散才重要。检验这些模型很困难,因为它们的影响会随尺度和场地生产力而变化。在一片退化的橡树林稀树草原中,我们在土壤深度各异的区域进行了样地尺度(种子添加、火烧)和场地尺度(当地发现的区域功能组比例)分析,以研究扩散和竞争如何影响多样性。在样地尺度上,添加的物种在以前没有的地方得以留存,但尽管有火烧导致的资源富集和附近的种群,很少有物种自然定殖,这揭示了扩散限制对多样性的重要性。这一结果并不随土壤深度或现存作物而变化。虽然竞争无法阻止在未火烧样地中的定殖,但它显著降低了存活率,表明资源限制加剧了扩散的低效性。在场地尺度上,本地物种的区域多样性与当地多样性之间的一致性与土壤深度异质性有关,而非扩散或竞争。这表明持久性主要由环境对种群统计学特征的影响决定。鉴于新种群的形成不太可能,剩下的种群似乎局限于最佳栖息地,在那里它们能够抵御竞争或随机替代,这可能解释了为什么尽管栖息地大量丧失和外来物种入侵,物种丧失却很少见。对于外来物种,多样性与土壤深度异质性之间没有关系。假定具有扩散能力的一年生植物在所有场地中显著占比过高,而作为最大区域功能组的多年生草本植物则显著占比过低。我们将本地物种与外来物种的差异解释为反映了外来物种的近期到来(150年前),这表明即使对于具有区域普遍性的物种,当地定殖也很缓慢。积累滞后可能是由于奠基种群需要在人口统计学上稳定;否则,持久性需要持续的迁入,这有利于扩散者的过度占比。我们的研究结果支持这样一种观点,即扩散限制限制了植物群落内的多样性,但表明环境对种群统计学表现的影响最终决定了群落组装的模式和速率。