Suppr超能文献

在没有神经肌肉阻滞剂的情况下,芬太尼-咪达唑仑-丙泊酚联合使用比芬太尼-利多卡因-丙泊酚提供更好的插管条件。

A combination of fentanyl-midazolam-propofol provides better intubating conditions than fentanyl-lignocaine-propofol in the absence of neuromuscular blocking agents.

作者信息

Prakash S, Arora D, Prakash S, Bhartiya V, Singh R

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College, Safdarjang Hospital, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Sep;50(8):999-1004. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01093.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of propofol and adjuvants such as opioids, benzodiazepines and local anaesthetic agents, may provide adequate conditions for tracheal intubation without the need for neuromuscular blocking agents. In this randomized, double-blind study, intubating conditions after induction of anaesthesia with propofol, midazolam and fentanyl were compared with those after propofol, lignocaine and fentanyl.

METHODS

In 80 ASA I/II adult patients undergoing elective gynaecological surgery, intubating conditions were compared after induction of anaesthesia with a fentanyl 2 microg/kg, midazolam 0.03 mg/kg, propofol 2.5 mg/kg combination (group FMP) vs. a fentanyl 2 microg/kg, lignocaine 1.5 mg/kg, propofol 2.5 mg/kg combination (group FLP). Intubating conditions were assessed using a qualitative scoring system.

RESULTS

Intubation was successful in all patients in group FMP and in 87.5% of patients in group FLP; (P= 0.021). Overall, intubating conditions were clinically acceptable in 77.5% and 55% of patients in group FMP and group FLP, respectively (P= 0.033).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the fentanyl, midazolam, propofol combination more reliably provides acceptable conditions for intubation than the fentanyl, lignocaine, propofol combination. Intubation was successful in all patients receiving the fentanyl, midazolam, propofol combination.

摘要

背景

使用丙泊酚及阿片类药物、苯二氮䓬类药物和局部麻醉药等辅助药物,可能无需使用神经肌肉阻滞剂就能为气管插管提供充分条件。在这项随机双盲研究中,比较了丙泊酚、咪达唑仑和芬太尼诱导麻醉后的插管条件与丙泊酚、利多卡因和芬太尼诱导麻醉后的插管条件。

方法

在80例接受择期妇科手术的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I/II级成年患者中,比较了芬太尼2μg/kg、咪达唑仑0.03mg/kg、丙泊酚2.5mg/kg联合用药(FMP组)与芬太尼2μg/kg、利多卡因1.5mg/kg、丙泊酚2.5mg/kg联合用药(FLP组)诱导麻醉后的插管条件。使用定性评分系统评估插管条件。

结果

FMP组所有患者插管均成功,FLP组87.5%的患者插管成功;(P = 0.021)。总体而言,FMP组和FLP组分别有77.5%和55%的患者插管条件在临床上可接受(P = 0.033)。

结论

我们得出结论,与芬太尼、利多卡因、丙泊酚联合用药相比,芬太尼、咪达唑仑、丙泊酚联合用药能更可靠地提供可接受的插管条件。接受芬太尼、咪达唑仑、丙泊酚联合用药的所有患者插管均成功。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验