Adamus M, Koutná J, Gabrhelík T, Zapletalová J
Klinika anesteziologie a resuscitace LF UP a FN, Olomouc.
Cas Lek Cesk. 2008;147(2):96-101.
Following opioid and intravenous anaesthetic, tracheal intubation may be accomplished without any muscle relaxant. In this study, we evaluated the dose requirements for sufentanil with propofol without muscle relaxant administration to obtain clinically acceptable intubation conditions and cardiovascular responses.
After midazolam (0.05 mg x kg(-1)), 90 patients were randomized into three equal groups, each receiving sufentanil 0.2 (SUF-0.2), 0.3 (SUF-0.3) or 0.4 (SUF-0.4) microg x kg(-1), respectively. Following induction of anaesthesia with propofol (2 mg x kg(-1)), the quality of tracheal intubation was assessed as excellent or good (clinically acceptable) and poor. Excellent intubation conditions were observed in 28%, 41% and 54% of patients in groups SUF-0.2, SUF-0.3 and SUF-0.4, respectively, while poor conditions were present in 31% (SUF-0.2; p = 0.041 vs. SUF-0.3, p = 0.006 vs SUF-0.4), 7% (SUF-0.3) and 3% (SUF-0.4). Patients with induction-related hypotension were older than those without (60 +/- 15 vs. 52 +/- 17 yr, p = 0.013).
Sufentanil (0.3-0.4 microg x kg(-1)) in combination with propofol (2 mg.kg(-1)) provided clinically acceptable intubating conditions in 93-97% patients.
在使用阿片类药物和静脉麻醉剂后,气管插管可在不使用任何肌肉松弛剂的情况下完成。在本研究中,我们评估了在不使用肌肉松弛剂的情况下,舒芬太尼与丙泊酚联合使用时达到临床可接受的插管条件及心血管反应所需的剂量。
给予咪达唑仑(0.05 mg·kg⁻¹)后,90例患者被随机分为三组,每组分别接受舒芬太尼0.2(SUF-0.2)、0.3(SUF-0.3)或0.4(SUF-0.4)μg·kg⁻¹。在使用丙泊酚(2 mg·kg⁻¹)诱导麻醉后,气管插管质量被评估为优或良(临床可接受)及差。SUF-0.2组、SUF-0.3组和SUF-0.4组分别有28%、41%和54%的患者观察到插管条件优,而差的条件分别出现在31%(SUF-0.2;与SUF-0.3相比p = 0.041,与SUF-