• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroconvulsive therapy in unipolar non-psychotic refractory depression: a randomized, single-blind study.

作者信息

Rosa Moacyr Alexandro, Gattaz Wagner Farid, Pascual-Leone Alvaro, Fregni Felipe, Rosa Marina Odebrecht, Rumi Demetrio Ortega, Myczkowski Martin, Silva Maria Fernanda, Mansur Carlos, Rigonatti Sergio Paulo, Jacobsen Teixeira Manuel, Marcolin Marco Antonio

机构信息

Institute of Psychiatry, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo-SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2006 Dec;9(6):667-76. doi: 10.1017/S1461145706007127. Epub 2006 Aug 21.

DOI:10.1017/S1461145706007127
PMID:16923322
Abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can induce significant antidepressant effects and, for some patients, might be an alternative to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). The results of studies comparing the efficacy of rTMS and ECT are mixed and, therefore, comparison of these two therapies needs to be further explored. Forty-two patients aged between 18 and 65 yr, referred to ECT due to unipolar non-psychotic depression refractoriness entered the trial. They were randomly assigned to receive either rTMS or ECT. Depressive symptom changes were blindly measured by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Visual Analogue Scale and Clinical Global Impression at baseline, after 2 wk and after 4 wk of treatment. There was no difference in the antidepressant efficacy of ECT and rTMS. Response rates were relatively low in both groups (40% and 50% respectively), with no significant difference between them (p=0.55). Remission rates were also low for both groups (20% and 10% respectively), also with no significant difference (p=0.631). There was no significant difference in the neuropsychological test performance after either one of these therapies. Both treatments were associated with a degree of improvement in refractory depression and therefore add to the literature that rTMS can be an effective option to ECT as it is a less costly treatment and is not associated with anaesthetic and other ECT risks.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroconvulsive therapy in unipolar non-psychotic refractory depression: a randomized, single-blind study.
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2006 Dec;9(6):667-76. doi: 10.1017/S1461145706007127. Epub 2006 Aug 21.
2
The clinical effectiveness and cost of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation versus electroconvulsive therapy in severe depression: a multicentre pragmatic randomised controlled trial and economic analysis.重复经颅磁刺激与电休克治疗重度抑郁症的临床疗效及成本:一项多中心实用随机对照试验及经济分析
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Jul;11(24):1-54. doi: 10.3310/hta11240.
3
A randomized, controlled trial with 6-month follow-up of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroconvulsive therapy for severe depression.一项针对重度抑郁症的重复经颅磁刺激和电休克治疗的随机对照试验,随访6个月。
Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Jan;164(1):73-81. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.1.73.
4
Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation inferior to electroconvulsive therapy in treating depression.低频重复经颅磁刺激治疗抑郁症不如电抽搐治疗。
J ECT. 2011 Mar;27(1):26-32. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e3181d77645.
5
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation versus electroconvulsive therapy for major depression: preliminary results of a randomized trial.重复经颅磁刺激与电休克治疗重度抑郁症:一项随机试验的初步结果
Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Apr 15;51(8):659-67. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(01)01354-3.
6
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.重复经颅磁刺激治疗难治性抑郁症:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016 Mar 1;16(5):1-66. eCollection 2016.
7
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation versus electroconvulsive therapy for major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.重复经颅磁刺激与电休克治疗重度抑郁症的系统评价与荟萃分析
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Jun 3;51:181-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
8
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation versus electroconvulsive therapy for major depression: a meta-analysis of stimulus parameter effects.重复经颅磁刺激与电休克治疗重度抑郁症:刺激参数效应的荟萃分析
Neurol Res. 2013 Dec;35(10):1084-91. doi: 10.1179/1743132813Y.0000000245. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
9
Antidepressant efficacy and cognitive effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in vascular depression: an open trial.重复经颅磁刺激治疗血管性抑郁的抗抑郁疗效及认知效应:一项开放性试验
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004 Sep;19(9):833-42. doi: 10.1002/gps.1172.
10
Cost-effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation vs. electroconvulsive therapy for severe depression: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial.经颅磁刺激与电休克治疗重度抑郁症的成本效益:一项多中心随机对照试验
J Affect Disord. 2008 Aug;109(3):273-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.01.001. Epub 2008 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
More rTMS pulses or more sessions? The impact on treatment outcome for treatment resistant depression.更多的重复经颅磁刺激脉冲还是更多的疗程?对难治性抑郁症治疗结果的影响。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2025 Apr;151(4):485-505. doi: 10.1111/acps.13768. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
2
rTMS Therapy Reduces Hypofrontality in Patients With Depression as Measured by fNIRS.经功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)测量,重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)疗法可减轻抑郁症患者的前额叶功能低下。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 22;13:814611. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.814611. eCollection 2022.
3
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for People With Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Health Technology Assessment.
重复经颅磁刺激治疗难治性抑郁症:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2021 May 6;21(4):1-232. eCollection 2021.
4
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)-Induced Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgia.重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)诱发的三叉神经自主性头痛
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2015 Sep;52(3):309-311. doi: 10.5152/npa.2015.7618. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
5
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression: An Economic Analysis.重复经颅磁刺激治疗难治性抑郁症的经济学分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016 Mar 1;16(6):1-51. eCollection 2016.
6
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.重复经颅磁刺激治疗难治性抑郁症:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016 Mar 1;16(5):1-66. eCollection 2016.
7
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression in Adult and Youth Populations: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.重复经颅磁刺激治疗成人和青少年难治性抑郁症:系统文献综述与荟萃分析
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2015 Nov 5;17(6). doi: 10.4088/PCC.15r01807. eCollection 2015.
8
Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of major depression.经颅磁刺激治疗重度抑郁症
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015 Jun 26;11:1549-60. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S67477. eCollection 2015.
9
Cost-effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy compared to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant severe depression: a decision model.与重复经颅磁刺激相比,电休克疗法治疗难治性重度抑郁症的成本效益:一项决策模型研究
Psychol Med. 2015 May;45(7):1459-70. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714002554. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
10
Comparing the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroconvulsive therapy in the treatment of depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较重复经颅磁刺激与电休克疗法治疗抑郁症的效果:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Depress Res Treat. 2014;2014:135049. doi: 10.1155/2014/135049. Epub 2014 Jul 21.