Grahn Sarah W, Alvarez Jesus, Kirkwood Kimberly
Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Arch Surg. 2006 Aug;141(8):755-61; discussion 761-2. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.8.755.
During the past 10 years, expertise with minimally invasive techniques has grown, leading to an increase in successful laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) even in the setting of massive and supramassive spleens.
Retrospective series of patients who underwent splenectomy from November 1, 1995, to August 31, 2005.
Academic tertiary care center.
Adult patients who underwent elective splenectomy as their primary procedure (n = 111).
Demographics, spleen size and weight, conversion from LS to open splenectomy, postoperative length of stay, and perioperative complications and mortality. Massive splenomegaly was defined as the spleen having a craniocaudal length greater than 17 cm or weight more than 600 g, and supramassive splenomegaly was defined as the spleen having a craniocaudal length greater than 22 cm or weight more than 1600 g.
Eighty-five (77%) of the 111 patients underwent LS. Of these 85 patients, 25 (29%) had massive or supramassive spleens. These accounted for 40% of LSs performed in 2004 and 50% in 2005. Despite this increase in giant spleens, the conversion rate for massive or supramassive spleens has declined from 33% prior to 1999 to 0% in 2004 and 2005. Since January 2004 at our institution, all of the massive or supramassive spleens have been removed with a laparoscopic approach. Patients with massive or supramassive spleens who underwent LS had no reoperations for bleeding or deaths and had a significantly shorter postoperative length of stay (mean postoperative length of stay, 3.8 days for patients who underwent LS vs 9.0 days for patients who underwent open splenectomy; P<.001).
Despite conflicting reports regarding the safety of LS for massive splenomegaly, our data indicate that with increasing institutional experience, the laparoscopic approach is safe, shortens the length of stay, and improves mortality.
在过去10年中,微创技术的专业水平有所提高,即使在脾脏巨大和超大的情况下,成功的腹腔镜脾切除术(LS)也有所增加。
对1995年11月1日至2005年8月31日接受脾切除术的患者进行回顾性系列研究。
学术性三级医疗中心。
接受择期脾切除术作为主要手术的成年患者(n = 111)。
人口统计学资料、脾脏大小和重量、从LS转为开放性脾切除术、术后住院时间、围手术期并发症和死亡率。巨脾定义为脾的头尾长度大于17 cm或重量超过600 g,超大脾定义为脾的头尾长度大于22 cm或重量超过1600 g。
111例患者中有85例(77%)接受了LS。在这85例患者中,25例(29%)有巨大或超大脾脏。这些患者占2004年进行的LS的40%,2005年的50%。尽管巨大脾脏的数量有所增加,但巨大或超大脾脏的转化率已从1999年前的33%降至2004年和2005年的0%。自2004年1月起,我们机构所有巨大或超大脾脏均采用腹腔镜方法切除。接受LS的巨大或超大脾脏患者没有因出血或死亡而再次手术,术后住院时间明显缩短(接受LS的患者术后平均住院时间为3.8天,接受开放性脾切除术的患者为9.0天;P<0.001)。
尽管关于LS治疗巨脾安全性的报道相互矛盾,但我们的数据表明,随着机构经验的增加,腹腔镜方法是安全的,可缩短住院时间并改善死亡率。