• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜脾切除术:用于巨脾和超大脾的疗效和结果。

Laparoscopic splenectomy: outcome and efficacy for massive and supramassive spleens.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Morristown Memorial Hospital-Atlantic Health, Morristown, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2012 Apr;203(4):517-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.05.014. Epub 2011 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.05.014
PMID:21924403
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Massive and supramassive splenomegaly are relative contraindications to pure laparoscopic splenectomy (LS).

METHODS

A retrospective review of adult patients was conducted for splenectomy occurring from 1999 to 2009. Massive and supramassive spleens were defined as craniocaudad length ≥ 17 cm or weight ≥ 600 g and craniocaudad length ≥ 22 cm or weight ≥ 1,600 g, respectively.

RESULTS

LS was done for 22 and open splenectomy for 21 patients, of which 12 and 14 were supramassive. Spleen weight and craniocaudad length were comparable. LS was associated with lower blood loss (308 vs 400 mL, P = .24), shorter length of stay (3 vs 4.5 days, P = .054), and similar morbidity (17% vs 14%). Two reoperations and 1 death occurred with open splenectomy. Operative times were longer for LS (195 vs 105 min, P = .008), while the conversion rate was 25%.

CONCLUSIONS

In cases of massive and supramassive splenomegaly, better outcomes are accomplished with LS than open splenectomy, and are comparable to hand-assisted LS.

摘要

背景

巨大和超巨大脾肿大是纯腹腔镜脾切除术(LS)的相对禁忌症。

方法

对 1999 年至 2009 年期间进行的脾切除术患者进行回顾性分析。巨大脾和超巨大脾分别定义为前后径≥17cm或重量≥600g和前后径≥22cm或重量≥1600g。

结果

LS 用于 22 例,开放性脾切除术用于 21 例,其中 12 例和 14 例为超巨大脾。脾重和前后径相当。LS 组出血量较少(308 比 400 毫升,P=0.24),住院时间较短(3 比 4.5 天,P=0.054),发病率相似(17%比 14%)。开放性脾切除术有 2 例再次手术和 1 例死亡。LS 的手术时间较长(195 比 105 分钟,P=0.008),但转化率为 25%。

结论

对于巨大和超巨大脾肿大,LS 比开放性脾切除术的效果更好,与手助 LS 相当。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic splenectomy: outcome and efficacy for massive and supramassive spleens.腹腔镜脾切除术:用于巨脾和超大脾的疗效和结果。
Am J Surg. 2012 Apr;203(4):517-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.05.014. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
2
Trends in laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly.巨大脾肿大的腹腔镜脾切除术趋势
Arch Surg. 2006 Aug;141(8):755-61; discussion 761-2. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.8.755.
3
Laparoscopic treatment of splenomegaly: a case for hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery.腹腔镜治疗脾肿大:手辅助腹腔镜手术的一个实例
Arch Surg. 2011 Jul;146(7):818-23. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.149.
4
Refining the selection criteria for laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for splenomegaly.优化脾肿大患者腹腔镜与开腹脾切除术的选择标准。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008 Feb;18(1):13-9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2007.0050.
5
The impact of splenic weight on laparoscopic splenectomy for splenomegaly.脾脏重量对脾肿大患者腹腔镜脾切除术的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2002 Jan;16(1):103-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9045-2. Epub 2001 Oct 5.
6
Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy for splenomegaly: a comparative study with conventional laparoscopic splenectomy.手辅助腹腔镜脾切除术治疗脾肿大:与传统腹腔镜脾切除术的比较研究
Chin Med J (Engl). 2007 Jan 5;120(1):41-5.
7
[Splenectomy in haematologic diseases. Clinical indications and surgical technique].[血液系统疾病中的脾切除术。临床指征与手术技术]
Chir Ital. 2005 May-Jun;57(3):283-91.
8
The feasibility and safety of laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly: a comparative study.腹腔镜脾切除术治疗巨脾的可行性和安全性:一项对比研究。
J Surg Res. 2011 Nov;171(1):e55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.06.040. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
9
Laparoscopic splenectomy: A retrospective review of 75 cases.
Int Surg. 2006 Mar-Apr;91(2):82-6.
10
Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for splenomegaly: the verdict is unclear.腹腔镜与开腹脾切除术治疗脾肿大:结果尚不清楚。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):1298-1303. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6394-7. Epub 2018 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Selection of surgical modality for massive splenomegaly in children.儿童巨大脾肿大的手术方式选择。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9070-9079. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10462-7. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
2
Laparoscopic splenectomy for massive splenomegaly: the "splenic no-touch" technique for hilar control by anterior lienorenal approach.腹腔镜巨脾切除术:经前肝肾韧带入路行脾门控制的“脾脏无接触”技术。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jan 16;408(1):30. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02800-z.
3
Postoperative Outcomes Following a Modified Method of Surgical Division of the Splenic Pedicle in 719 Patients During Splenectomy for Portal Hypertension: A 12-Year, Retrospective, Single-Center Study.
719 例门脉高压症脾切除术采用改良脾蒂分割法的术后结果:12 年回顾性单中心研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2022 Aug 30;28:e937763. doi: 10.12659/MSM.937763.
4
Primary splenic lymphoma discovered on massive splenomegaly: A case report.因巨脾发现的原发性脾淋巴瘤:一例报告
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022 May;94:107124. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107124. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
5
Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic splenectomy for hypersplenism secondary to portal hypertension after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术后腹腔镜脾切除术治疗门静脉高压继发脾功能亢进的疗效及安全性
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Feb 11;21(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01647-2.
6
Outcomes of Laparoscopic Splenectomy for Treatment of Splenomegaly: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.腹腔镜脾切除术治疗脾肿大的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2021 Feb;45(2):465-479. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05839-x. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
7
The Diagnostic Utility of Splenectomy in Idiopathic Splenomegaly.脾切除术在特发性脾肿大中的诊断效用。
World J Surg. 2020 Sep;44(9):2959-2964. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05566-3.
8
Predicting venous thrombosis in patients undergoing elective splenectomy.预测择期脾切除术患者的静脉血栓形成。
Surg Endosc. 2020 May;34(5):2191-2196. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07007-2. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
9
Quest for the optimal technique of laparoscopic splenectomy - vessels first or hilar transection?探索腹腔镜脾切除术的最佳技术——血管优先还是脾门横断?
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2018 Dec;13(4):460-468. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.76071. Epub 2018 May 30.
10
Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for splenomegaly: the verdict is unclear.腹腔镜与开腹脾切除术治疗脾肿大:结果尚不清楚。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):1298-1303. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6394-7. Epub 2018 Aug 27.