Barros Aluísio J D
Programa de Pós-graduação em Epidemiologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brasil.
Rev Saude Publica. 2006 Aug;40 Spec no.:43-9. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102006000400007.
Collective Health is characteristically a broad and complex field of study, presenting itself as a major challenge for the evaluation process carried out by Capes. The aim of the present work was to provide a panorama of postgraduate education in the field of collective health and to discuss aspects of the criteria adopted for its evaluation. The evaluation of postgraduate programs is carried out on a yearly basis. For this, program structure, its academic staff and students, research and teaching activities, theses and dissertations, and intellectual production are taken into account. The evaluation of the latter has been subject of criticism for favoring the publication of papers and for basing ranking of production on journal indexing and impact factors. Despite criticisms and reservations towards the evaluation process, the analysis of the Brazilian scientific production, in general and in the case of Collective Health, shows a very positive scenario, with an important increase in the number of postgraduate courses, teachers, and students. Thus, the panorama of postgraduate programs is favorable, but continuously rethinking and perfecting the evaluation process is essential to guarantee its contribution to the growth and strengthening of the system.
群体健康学是一个典型的广泛而复杂的研究领域,对巴西高等教育人员发展协调局(Capes)开展的评估工作构成重大挑战。本研究的目的是呈现群体健康领域研究生教育的全景,并探讨其评估所采用标准的相关方面。研究生课程评估每年进行一次。为此,会考虑课程结构、学术人员和学生、研究与教学活动、论文以及知识产出等方面。对后者的评估因倾向于论文发表以及将产出排名基于期刊索引和影响因子而受到批评。尽管对评估过程存在批评和保留意见,但总体而言,对巴西科研产出的分析,特别是群体健康领域的分析,呈现出非常积极的态势,研究生课程、教师和学生数量都有显著增加。因此,研究生课程的全景是有利的,但持续反思和完善评估过程对于确保其对该体系的发展和强化做出贡献至关重要。