Lucena Adson Freitas de, Tibúrcio Rachel Vasconcelos
Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2009 May-Jun;55(3):247-8. doi: 10.1590/s0104-42302009000300011.
The QUALIS classification for the national system of post graduation has currently adopted a new ranking method developed for analysis of their periodicals and programs that has little to do with the quality of scientific production. The academic field involves so many subtleties of quality that the ideal of quantification to assess publications has aroused the justified dissatisfaction of many. We understand that the assessment of academic training must be a current goal of educational institutions that provide graduation and post-graduation. . Under this concept, quality is a key to the development of abilities and skills of a society in constant transformation. To modify this system of assessment requiring from academics teaching and scientific skills that do not always result from research activity, will further development on the institutional, faculty and student level..
国家研究生系统的QUALIS分类目前采用了一种新的排名方法,该方法是为分析其期刊和项目而开发的,与科研产出质量几乎无关。学术领域涉及诸多质量方面的微妙之处,用量化方式评估出版物的理想做法引起了许多人的合理不满。我们明白,对学术培训进行评估必定是提供本科和研究生教育的教育机构当前的目标。在这一理念下,质量是处于不断变革中的社会能力和技能发展的关键。修改这一评估体系,要求学者具备并非总能从研究活动中产生的教学和科研技能,将在机构、教师和学生层面带来进一步发展。