Casanova Marcia Spinelli, Haiter-Neto Francisco, Bóscolo Frab Norberto, de Almeida Solange Maria
Department of Oral Diagnosis, Faculty of Dentistry of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Braz Dent J. 2006;17(2):149-54. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402006000200013.
The aim of this study was to compare the sensitometric properties of Insight and Ektaspeed Plus radiographic films manually and automatically processed using fresh and depleted chemical solutions. Ten sets of each type of film were obtained (1 set = 5 films), 5 sets being manually processed and 5 sets being automatically processed. A total of 100 films (50 Ektaspeed Plus and 50 Insight film) were exposed and developed. The first two sets of each film type were developed in fresh chemicals (one set per each type of processing), on the first day of the experiment. The other sets were processed in the same progressively depleted solutions once a week until the end of experiment, which was completed within 4 weeks. Characteristic curves were constructed to compare the sensitometric properties of the films: contrast, latitude and speed. Processing solution depletion had different effects on manually and automatically developed films, which was confirmed by the changes in the form of the characteristic curves in the third week of the automatic processing and fourth week of the manual processing. Ektaspeed Plus showed 11% reduction in contrast values for manual processing and 53% for automatic processing, while Insight contrast values showed a reduction of 25% and 59%, respectively. Insight film, however, showed lesser loss of speed and lesser increase of latitude than Ektaspeed Plus. In conclusion, chemical depletion in automatic film processing was faster than in manual developing. In depleted chemicals, both types of films had an increase in latitude values and a decrease in speed and contrast. Insight was more resistant than Ektaspeed Plus to decrease in speed and latitude when processed using older chemicals, whereas contrast in Ektaspeed Plus was comparatively more stable.
本研究的目的是比较使用新鲜和耗尽化学溶液手动和自动冲洗的Insight和Ektaspeed Plus射线胶片的感光特性。每种类型的胶片获取了10套(1套 = 5张胶片),其中5套进行手动冲洗,5套进行自动冲洗。总共100张胶片(50张Ektaspeed Plus胶片和50张Insight胶片)进行了曝光和显影。每种胶片类型的前两组在实验第一天用新鲜化学药剂显影(每种冲洗类型一组)。其他组每周一次在相同逐渐耗尽的溶液中冲洗,直到实验结束,实验在4周内完成。构建特性曲线以比较胶片的感光特性:对比度、宽容度和感光度。冲洗溶液的耗尽对手动和自动冲洗的胶片有不同影响,这在自动冲洗第三周和手动冲洗第四周特性曲线形式的变化中得到证实。Ektaspeed Plus胶片手动冲洗时对比度值降低11%,自动冲洗时降低53%,而Insight胶片的对比度值分别降低25%和59%。然而,Insight胶片的感光度损失较小,宽容度增加也比Ektaspeed Plus小。总之,自动胶片冲洗中化学药剂的耗尽比手动冲洗更快。在耗尽的化学药剂中,两种类型的胶片宽容度值都增加,感光度和对比度降低。使用旧化学药剂冲洗时,Insight比Ektaspeed Plus更耐感光度和宽容度的降低,而Ektaspeed Plus的对比度相对更稳定。